Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wagner Danny's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wagner Danny's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wagner Danny's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wagner Danny's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 00:43 | 03:05 to 02:22 | 23.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:43 | 04:57 to 04:14 | 23.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 04:45 to 04:04 | 22.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 05:36 to 05:14 | 11.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 04:28 to 04:14 | 7.6% |
| Run Total | 00:12 | 38:30 to 38:18 | 6.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 01:55 to 01:49 | 3.2% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:36 to 04:32 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Wagner Danny | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 04:08 | 04:20 -00:15 | 04:19 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:21 | 08:13 | 04:38 -00:17 | 08:39 -00:26 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 12:34 | 02:40 +00:25 | 13:17 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 04:55 | 15:39 | 05:01 -00:06 | 15:57 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 20:34 | 04:27 +00:18 | 20:58 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 25:19 | 05:00 -00:10 | 25:25 -00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:28 | 30:09 | 04:40 -00:12 | 30:25 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 04:51 | 34:37 | 05:09 -00:18 | 35:05 -00:28 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 39:28 | 04:39 -00:03 | 40:14 -00:46 |
| Running 6 | 04:53 | 44:04 | 05:02 -00:09 | 44:53 -00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 48:57 | 02:01 -00:06 | 49:55 -00:58 |
| Running 7 | 04:56 | 50:52 | 05:01 -00:05 | 51:56 -01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:57 | 55:48 | 04:35 +00:22 | 56:57 -01:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:38 | 01:00:45 | 05:27 +00:11 | 01:01:32 -00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:06:23 | 05:46 -00:10 | 01:06:59 -00:36 |
| Roxzone | 06:46 | 01:18:40 | 05:55 +00:51 | 01:18:40 |
Danny's pacing throughout the race was consistent, with his running splits generally faster than average. He performed particularly well in the Ski Erg and Running 2 segments, where he was 13 and 15 seconds faster than average, respectively. His running performance as a whole was strong, with a total running time that was faster than average.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific exercises and drills into his training routine, Danny can improve his performance in the identified areas of improvement. With consistent training and focus on his weaknesses, he has the potential to achieve even better results in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| O'Neill Robin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:39 | |
| Williamson Ricky | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:58 | |
| Johnson Oliver | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:26 | |
| Flees Robert | 2022 Chicago | 01:19:02 | |
| Mcstay Sean | 2022 London | 01:18:24 | |
| Untersteiner Fellin Fabian | 2024 Milan | 01:18:32 | |
| Serra Toni Joan | 2023 Bilbao | 01:18:35 | |
| Smith Rob | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:10 | |
| Riedlinger Thorben | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:18:50 | |
| Blackburn Blaine | 2023 Dallas | 01:18:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:45 | |
| 2021 Hamburg | 01:24:29 | |
| 2022 Essen | 01:21:46 | |
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:19:36 | |
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:17:22 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:17:22 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
