Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Hannover using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 830 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Glock Peter's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Glock Peter's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Glock Peter's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Glock Peter's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:16 | 57:04 to 50:48 | 81.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:24 | 08:35 to 07:11 | 18.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:28 to 03:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:35 to 06:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:27 to 08:27 | 0.0% |
| Glock Peter | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:03 | 00:00 | 05:21 +01:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 07:03 | 04:46 -00:09 | 05:21 +01:42 |
| Running 2 | 06:52 | 11:40 | 05:55 +00:57 | 10:07 +01:33 |
| Sled Push | 03:28 | 18:32 | 03:39 -00:11 | 16:02 +02:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:56 | 22:00 | 06:33 +00:23 | 19:41 +02:19 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 28:56 | 06:23 -01:20 | 26:14 +02:42 |
| Running 4 | 06:47 | 33:59 | 06:33 +00:14 | 32:37 +01:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:35 | 40:46 | 07:24 +01:11 | 39:10 +01:36 |
| Running 5 | 07:44 | 49:21 | 06:50 +00:54 | 46:34 +02:47 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 57:05 | 05:17 -00:24 | 53:24 +03:41 |
| Running 6 | 07:30 | 01:01:58 | 06:39 +00:51 | 58:41 +03:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 01:09:28 | 02:40 -00:29 | 01:05:20 +04:08 |
| Running 7 | 07:25 | 01:11:39 | 06:38 +00:47 | 01:08:00 +03:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:35 | 01:19:04 | 06:55 -00:20 | 01:14:38 +04:26 |
| Running 8 | 06:50 | 01:25:39 | 08:09 -01:19 | 01:21:33 +04:06 |
| Wall Balls | 08:27 | 01:32:29 | 08:50 -00:23 | 01:29:42 +02:47 |
| Roxzone | 07:35 | 01:48:22 | 09:50 -02:15 | 01:48:22 |
In terms of running, Peter's total running time was 00:57:04, which was 06:58 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running performance. However, it is worth noting that his best running lap was 00:06:47, which was faster than the average. This suggests that he has the potential to excel in running and should continue to develop this area.
In summary, Peter Glock had a solid performance in the Hyrox race in Hannover. To improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running technique and endurance, optimizing his transition time, and implementing effective race strategies. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, Peter can enhance his performance in the identified areas of improvement and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gnoevoi Vasilii | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:48:25 | |
| Bauso Angelo | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:48:46 | |
| Cassidy John | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:48:45 | |
| Olsson Anders | 2023 Stockholm | 01:48:33 | |
| Sorensen Michael | 2024 Malaga | 01:48:13 | |
| Chura Joseph | 2023 Chicago | 01:47:53 | |
| Molic Bekim | 2024 New York | 01:48:05 | |
| Croizier Benjamin | 2023 Paris | 01:48:39 | |
| Kruize Tobias | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:48:25 | |
| Magallan Jonathan | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:48:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
