Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rush Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rush Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rush Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rush Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:41 | 43:00 to 41:19 | 40.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:58 | 03:38 to 02:40 | 23.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 05:09 to 04:35 | 13.6% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 05:09 to 04:43 | 10.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:24 | 05:19 to 04:55 | 9.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:29 to 04:22 | 2.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Rush Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:44 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 03:44 | 04:26 +00:03 | 04:35 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 08:13 | 04:55 -00:04 | 09:01 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 03:38 | 13:04 | 02:51 +00:47 | 13:56 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 16:42 | 05:22 +00:11 | 16:47 -00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 22:15 | 04:51 +00:18 | 22:09 +00:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 27:24 | 05:20 +00:16 | 27:00 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 33:00 | 05:15 +00:04 | 32:20 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:45 | 38:19 | 05:30 +00:15 | 37:35 +00:44 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 44:04 | 04:48 +00:21 | 43:05 +00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 49:13 | 05:21 +00:14 | 47:53 +01:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 54:48 | 02:09 -00:27 | 53:14 +01:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 56:30 | 05:20 +00:19 | 55:23 +01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:43 | 01:02:09 | 05:02 -00:19 | 01:00:43 +01:26 |
| Running 8 | 06:21 | 01:06:52 | 05:57 +00:24 | 01:05:45 +01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:54 | 01:13:13 | 06:25 -01:31 | 01:11:42 +01:31 |
| Roxzone | 06:52 | 01:24:51 | 06:44 +00:08 | 01:24:51 |
It is worth noting that Patrick's Total running time was 01:45 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus more on improving his running ability. Additionally, his Roxzone time was 00:25 slower than the average, suggesting that he could benefit from enhancing his overall fitness and reducing transition time.
In summary, Patrick Rush had a commendable performance in the 2023 Birmingham Hyrox race. While he showed strength in certain segments, there are areas that need improvement. By focusing on improving his running ability, building strength in specific segments, and implementing effective race strategies, Patrick can enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kulkarni Adit | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:29 | |
| Florell Erik | 2023 Malmö | 01:25:17 | |
| Pizzichini Valerio | 2024 Milan | 01:25:12 | |
| Wagner Danny | 2021 Hamburg | 01:24:29 | |
| Serpelloni Maxime | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:41 | |
| Łuczak Łukasz | 2024 Poznan | 01:25:21 | |
| Davies Grant | 2023 Manchester | 01:25:21 | |
| Fazackerley Lee | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:41 | |
| Millbank George | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:41 | |
| Cioni Alessandro | 2024 Turin | 01:24:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:24:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
