Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire James Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights James Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the James Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve James Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:52 | 08:28 to 05:36 | 33.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:51 | 08:07 to 06:16 | 21.6% |
| Run Total | 01:35 | 48:35 to 47:00 | 18.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:59 | 03:25 to 02:26 | 11.5% |
| Rowing | 00:41 | 05:44 to 05:03 | 8.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:28 | 03:45 to 03:17 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:46 to 04:38 | 1.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| James Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:50 | 00:00 | 05:03 -01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 03:50 | 04:38 +00:08 | 05:03 -01:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 08:36 | 05:29 -00:05 | 09:41 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:45 | 14:00 | 03:18 +00:27 | 15:10 -01:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 17:45 | 06:01 +00:07 | 18:28 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 08:28 | 23:53 | 05:45 +02:43 | 24:29 -00:36 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 32:21 | 06:01 +00:06 | 30:14 +02:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:07 | 38:28 | 06:31 +01:36 | 36:15 +02:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:48 | 46:35 | 06:16 +00:32 | 42:46 +03:49 |
| Rowing | 05:44 | 53:23 | 05:06 +00:38 | 49:02 +04:21 |
| Running 6 | 06:23 | 59:07 | 06:05 +00:18 | 54:08 +04:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:25 | 01:05:30 | 02:28 +00:57 | 01:00:13 +05:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:28 | 01:08:55 | 06:04 +00:24 | 01:02:41 +06:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:17 | 01:15:23 | 06:05 -00:48 | 01:08:45 +06:38 |
| Running 8 | 07:32 | 01:20:40 | 07:02 +00:30 | 01:14:50 +05:50 |
| Wall Balls | 02:23 | 01:28:12 | 07:52 -05:29 | 01:21:52 +06:20 |
| Roxzone | 07:43 | 01:38:08 | 08:24 -00:41 | 01:38:08 |
Andrew's best running lap was 00:03:50, which was 01:00 faster than the average. This indicates that his running speed is a strength. However, his overall running time was slower than average, suggesting that he may need to focus on improving his endurance and pacing.
Additionally, Andrew should prioritize efficient transitions between segments to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Practicing quick and smooth transitions during training can help improve overall race performance.
In conclusion, Andrew James had a solid performance in the HYROX race in Birmingham. While he showed strengths in certain segments, there are areas that can be improved to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as HIIT workouts, strength training exercises, and practicing efficient technique, Andrew can work towards improving his endurance, speed, and overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Donaldson Michael | 2024 Glasgow | 01:37:45 | |
| Reynolds Jeff | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:38:30 | |
| White Dave | 2022 Birmingham | 01:37:44 | |
| Allen Freddy | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:38:00 | |
| Nixon Dan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:37:58 | |
| jacobsohn pascal | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:38:09 | |
| Madsen Jonas | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:37:53 | |
| Perugini Fabio | 2024 Turin | 01:38:10 | |
| Harris Stefan | 2022 Birmingham | 01:38:04 | |
| Pluskota Tomasz | 2024 Poznan | 01:37:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
