Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gidman Barry's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gidman Barry's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gidman Barry's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gidman Barry's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 06:29 to 05:19 | 37.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:41 | 03:32 to 02:51 | 21.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 02:38 to 02:08 | 16.0% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 05:07 to 04:49 | 9.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:17 | 06:42 to 06:25 | 9.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:12 | 05:05 to 04:53 | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:32 to 41:32 | 0.0% |
| Gidman Barry | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:19 | 00:00 | 04:43 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 05:19 | 04:29 -00:15 | 04:43 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 09:33 | 05:06 -00:14 | 09:12 +00:21 |
| Sled Push | 03:32 | 14:25 | 03:00 +00:32 | 14:18 +00:07 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 17:57 | 05:33 -00:35 | 17:18 +00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 05:05 | 22:55 | 05:06 -00:01 | 22:51 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 28:00 | 05:32 -00:31 | 27:57 +00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:29 | 33:01 | 05:37 +00:52 | 33:29 -00:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 39:30 | 05:43 -00:32 | 39:06 +00:24 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 44:41 | 04:52 +00:15 | 44:49 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 49:48 | 05:34 -00:18 | 49:41 +00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 55:04 | 02:15 +00:23 | 55:15 -00:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 57:42 | 05:33 -00:20 | 57:30 +00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:32 | 01:02:55 | 05:21 -00:49 | 01:03:03 -00:08 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:07:27 | 06:14 -00:29 | 01:08:24 -00:57 |
| Wall Balls | 06:42 | 01:13:12 | 06:48 -00:06 | 01:14:38 -01:26 |
| Roxzone | 08:50 | 01:28:37 | 07:11 +01:39 | 01:28:37 |
Barry Gidman showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. His overall rank and rank in the age group 35-39 put him in the top half of the competitors, which demonstrates a high level of fitness and dedication. His total running time was notably faster than average, showing a strong runner's profile. However, there is scope for improvement, particularly in transitioning between exercise zones, as indicated by the Roxzone time.
Barry's pacing seemed to vary across the race. He started slower than average in Running 1, but improved in subsequent running segments, generally finishing faster than average. This suggests that he could benefit from working on his initial pacing to ensure a strong start to the race.
For future races, Barry could consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Simmons Matthew | 2024 London | 01:28:41 | |
| Bartley Alex | 2023 Birmingham | 01:29:02 | |
| Hood Jordan | 2022 London | 01:28:17 | |
| Jonczyński Karol | 2024 Poznan | 01:28:49 | |
| Brehm Christian | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:28:31 | |
| Valentin Renou | 2023 Barcelona | 01:28:31 | |
| Carlin Conor | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:58 | |
| Renkers Lars | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:28:25 | |
| Tardieu Miles | 2019 Hamburg | 01:28:10 | |
| Horn Sam | 2022 Manchester | 01:28:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:29:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
