Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:51.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Mats Dreuning's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race places him in the top 52% of all competitors and top 51% within his age group, which indicates a solid showing in a competitive field. His overall time of 01:35:57 reflects an athlete who possesses a balanced profile, displaying both strength and endurance capabilities. Notably, Mats demonstrated strong performances in strength-oriented segments such as the Sled Push, Rowing, Farmers Carry, and Sandbag Lunges, where he ranked within the top 10% for some. However, his total running time was slower than average by 04:16, suggesting an area for improvement given his current runner profile. Additionally, Mats' pacing strategy shows he started strongly but faded in the middle segments, particularly in Running 6, where he was significantly slower than average.
Segments to Improve
Sled Pull: Mats was 00:54 slower than average in this segment. To improve, focus on upper body strength and grip work. Exercises: Heavy rope pulls, deadlifts, and grip strength drills such as farmer's walks with towels can help. Prioritize form, ensuring the chest remains upright and the core is engaged during pulls.
Running Total: The total running time was 04:16 slower than average. Incorporate interval training, focusing on running after strength exercises to simulate race conditions. Drills: Tempo runs, hill sprints, and long-distance endurance runs will enhance overall running efficiency.
Wall Balls: Mats was 00:11 faster than average but can still benefit from improved efficiency in this segment. Focus on maintaining a consistent pace and minimizing rest. Techniques: Practice wall balls with varied weights and heights to build adaptability and core strength.
Race Strategies
Effective Pacing: Mats should develop a more consistent pacing strategy to avoid early burnout. Implement practice races where the first half is run at a controlled pace, conserving energy for later stages.
Transition Efficiency: While Mats' Roxzone time was faster than average, continuous improvement in transitions can shave off crucial seconds. Practice transitions in training to develop efficient, fluid movements between segments.
Compromised Running: Incorporate compromised running drills in training, where running is performed immediately after high-intensity strength exercises. This will help adapt the body to switching between modalities during the race.