Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Crawshaw Ben's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Crawshaw Ben's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Crawshaw Ben's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Crawshaw Ben's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:16 | 45:45 to 40:29 | 85.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:37 | 03:12 to 02:35 | 10.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 04:52 to 04:37 | 4.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 05:48 to 05:45 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:26 to 01:26 | 0.0% |
| Crawshaw Ben | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:24 | 00:00 | 04:29 -01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:57 | 03:24 | 04:24 -00:27 | 04:29 -01:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 07:21 | 04:51 +00:27 | 08:53 -01:32 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 12:39 | 02:51 +00:21 | 13:44 -01:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 15:51 | 05:14 +00:35 | 16:35 -00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 03:48 | 21:40 | 04:45 -00:57 | 21:49 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 25:28 | 05:13 +00:48 | 26:34 -01:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:12 | 31:29 | 05:03 -00:51 | 31:47 -00:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 35:41 | 05:23 +00:34 | 36:50 -01:09 |
| Rowing | 04:19 | 41:38 | 04:45 -00:26 | 42:13 -00:35 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 45:57 | 05:15 +00:43 | 46:58 -01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:26 | 51:55 | 02:07 -00:41 | 52:13 -00:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:23 | 53:21 | 05:14 +01:09 | 54:20 -00:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 59:44 | 04:53 -00:01 | 59:34 +00:10 |
| Running 8 | 06:59 | 01:04:36 | 05:45 +01:14 | 01:04:27 +00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 05:48 | 01:11:35 | 06:14 -00:26 | 01:10:12 +01:23 |
| Roxzone | 05:39 | 01:22:54 | 06:28 -00:49 | 01:22:54 |
Ben's best running lap was 00:03:24, which was 00:56 faster than the average. This indicates that he has good speed and endurance during certain sections of the race. However, his splits analysis reveals areas where he can improve his performance.
Additionally, Ben should focus on efficient transitions between segments to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Practicing quick transitions during training sessions will help him become more efficient and save valuable time during the race.
To enhance his performance, Ben should also focus on mental preparation and maintaining a positive mindset throughout the race. Visualizing success, setting small goals for each segment, and staying motivated will help him push through any challenges and perform at his best.
Overall, by incorporating the suggested training strategies and techniques, Ben can improve his running performance and overall race results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bouwmeester Jeen | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:44 | |
| Collins Dean | 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:17 | |
| Stewart Bryan | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:22:37 | |
| Brady Joseph | 2023 Manchester | 01:23:03 | |
| Mc Derment Leslie James | 2023 Glasgow | 01:23:23 | |
| Biaya Alex | 2024 Cape Town | 01:23:02 | |
| Tsang Sai Kit | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:35 | |
| Brière Thomas | 2024 Marseille | 01:22:36 | |
| Reshetnikov Serge | 2024 Houston | 01:22:45 | |
| De Groot Benjamin | 2019 Essen | 01:22:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:30:16 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:17 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:33:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
