Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Becker Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Becker Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Becker Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Becker Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:52 | 44:17 to 42:25 | 36.7% |
| Sled Push | 01:35 | 03:54 to 02:19 | 31.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:32 | 05:39 to 05:07 | 10.5% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 05:35 to 05:07 | 9.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:27 | 05:19 to 04:52 | 8.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:08 to 01:59 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:54 to 04:53 | 0.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:01 | 03:57 to 03:56 | 0.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Becker Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 04:55 -01:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 03:46 | 05:00 -00:06 | 04:55 -01:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 08:40 | 05:15 +00:01 | 09:55 -01:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:54 | 13:56 | 02:35 +01:19 | 15:10 -01:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:43 | 17:50 | 05:30 +00:13 | 17:45 +00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:19 | 23:33 | 05:21 -00:02 | 23:15 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 28:52 | 05:32 +00:03 | 28:36 +00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:39 | 34:27 | 05:34 +00:05 | 34:08 +00:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 40:06 | 05:40 +00:12 | 39:42 +00:24 |
| Rowing | 05:35 | 45:58 | 05:14 +00:21 | 45:22 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 51:33 | 05:34 +00:09 | 50:36 +00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 57:16 | 02:09 -00:01 | 56:10 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 59:24 | 05:31 +00:24 | 58:19 +01:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:51 | 01:05:19 | 04:25 -00:34 | 01:03:50 +01:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:09:10 | 05:53 +00:38 | 01:08:15 +00:55 |
| Wall Balls | 03:57 | 01:15:41 | 04:28 -00:31 | 01:14:08 +01:33 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:24:52 | 06:16 -00:52 | 01:24:52 |
Sarah's total running time was 00:44:17, which was 01:35 slower than the average. This indicates that she may need to work on improving her running speed and efficiency. Her best running lap was 00:03:46, which was 00:56 faster than the average.
- Transition Efficiency: Sarah should focus on improving her transition time between segments (roxzone). By practicing efficient transitions during training, she can minimize time lost during the race. This can be achieved by practicing quick and smooth equipment transitions and minimizing rest periods.
- Mental Preparation: Sarah should focus on mental preparation to maintain focus and motivation throughout the race. Implementing visualization techniques and positive self-talk can help her stay mentally strong during challenging segments.
Incorporating these strategies, along with the specific training techniques and exercises mentioned, will help Sarah improve her performance in the identified areas and enhance her overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schulz Eva | 2019 Hamburg | 01:24:29 | |
| Sands Leanne | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:16 | |
| Costa Boschetto Susi | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:47 | |
| Estanga Hidalgo Genesis De Jess | 2023 Madrid | 01:24:41 | |
| Flubacker Elisabeth | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:30 | |
| O Reilly Rose | 2021 Dallas | 01:24:43 | |
| Snchez Martnez Reyes | 2023 Valencia | 01:24:39 | |
| Glen Ashley | 2023 Stockholm | 01:25:10 | |
| Reid Emma | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:25:17 | |
| Rösler Sarah | 2019 Hamburg | 01:24:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Hamburg | 01:29:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
