Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Arnott Stephen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Arnott Stephen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Arnott Stephen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Arnott Stephen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:32 | 43:41 to 41:09 | 52.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:18 | 06:02 to 04:44 | 27.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:21 | 03:00 to 02:39 | 7.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:22 to 02:01 | 7.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 04:38 to 04:21 | 5.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Arnott Stephen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 04:34 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 04:23 | 04:25 +00:13 | 04:34 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 09:01 | 04:54 +00:13 | 08:59 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 14:08 | 02:51 +00:09 | 13:53 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 17:08 | 05:21 +00:04 | 16:44 +00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 22:33 | 04:51 -00:28 | 22:05 +00:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 26:56 | 05:19 +00:12 | 26:56 +00:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:25 | 32:27 | 05:13 -00:48 | 32:15 +00:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 36:52 | 05:29 +00:06 | 37:28 -00:36 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 42:27 | 04:47 -00:09 | 42:57 -00:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 47:05 | 05:20 +00:20 | 47:44 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 52:45 | 02:08 +00:14 | 53:04 -00:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 55:07 | 05:19 +00:21 | 55:12 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:02 | 01:00:47 | 05:00 +01:02 | 01:00:31 +00:16 |
| Running 8 | 06:22 | 01:06:49 | 05:55 +00:27 | 01:05:31 +01:18 |
| Wall Balls | 05:31 | 01:13:11 | 06:21 -00:50 | 01:11:26 +01:45 |
| Roxzone | 05:55 | 01:24:30 | 06:43 -00:48 | 01:24:30 |
Stephen's total running time was 00:43:41, which was 02:44 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that Stephen may benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:04:23, which was 00:02 faster than the average.
In summary, Stephen Arnott showed a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Manchester. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on improving his running fitness, strength, and transition times. Implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and mental preparation, can help Stephen enhance his performance in the identified segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gaya Rossello Miki | 2023 Valencia | 01:24:08 | |
| Senaen Edwardo | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:24:29 | |
| Cotterhill Niall | 2023 London | 01:24:58 | |
| James Luke | 2023 Manchester | 01:25:00 | |
| Pennie Brian | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:08 | |
| Cartledge Sean | 2023 Dublin | 01:24:57 | |
| Falzon Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:50 | |
| Amin Prash | 2023 Malaga | 01:24:11 | |
| Etim Neil | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:04 | |
| Brown Andre | 2024 London | 01:24:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Birmingham | 01:28:26 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:28:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
