Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Malaga using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Plante Jonathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Plante Jonathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Plante Jonathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Plante Jonathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:15 | 40:31 to 37:16 | 66.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:48 | 02:33 to 01:45 | 16.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 02:55 to 02:15 | 13.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 03:59 to 03:54 | 1.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 04:08 to 04:04 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:12 to 04:10 | 0.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Plante Jonathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 04:14 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 04:10 | 04:18 -00:06 | 04:14 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 08:22 | 04:33 +00:16 | 08:32 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 13:11 | 02:37 +00:18 | 13:05 +00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:09 | 16:06 | 04:53 +00:16 | 15:42 +00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 03:59 | 21:15 | 04:21 -00:22 | 20:35 +00:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:09 | 25:14 | 04:52 +00:17 | 24:56 +00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:51 | 30:23 | 04:31 -00:40 | 29:48 +00:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 34:14 | 04:59 +00:29 | 34:19 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 39:42 | 04:36 -00:12 | 39:18 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 44:06 | 04:53 +00:11 | 43:54 +00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 49:10 | 01:57 +00:36 | 48:47 +00:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 51:43 | 04:52 +00:18 | 50:44 +00:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 56:53 | 04:26 -00:18 | 55:36 +01:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:01:01 | 05:15 +00:19 | 01:00:02 +00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 04:56 | 01:06:35 | 05:37 -00:41 | 01:05:17 +01:18 |
| Roxzone | 05:10 | 01:16:33 | 05:39 -00:29 | 01:16:33 |
Based on the splits analysis, Jonathan showed consistent performance throughout the race. His best running lap was 00:04:10, which was only 5 seconds slower than the average. He also performed well in the Ski Erg and Sled Pull segments, where he was faster than the average.
- Transitions: Jonathan should focus on improving his transition times in the roxzone. This can be achieved through practicing quick and efficient transitions during training sessions. Setting up mock transition areas and practicing moving smoothly between exercises can help reduce the time spent in the roxzone.
- Mental Preparation: Jonathan should work on his mental preparation for the race. Visualizing success, setting specific goals, and staying focused during the race can help him maintain motivation and perform at his best.
Overall, Jonathan Plante had a solid performance in the 2023 Malaga Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, strengthening his upper body and core, and refining his race strategies, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Duggan Conor | 2024 Dublin | 01:16:51 | |
| Serrano Ramirez Juan Antonio | 2023 Malaga | 01:16:52 | |
| Clack David | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:16:52 | |
| Baerecke Gareth | 2024 Glasgow | 01:16:45 | |
| Asci Piran | 2024 Paris | 01:16:55 | |
| Mcreynolds Matthew | 2022 Dallas | 01:16:38 | |
| Artero Raphaël | 2024 Malaga | 01:16:45 | |
| Klussmeier Swen | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:16:46 | |
| Cohn Sebastian | 2023 Anaheim | 01:16:16 | |
| Lukas Frank | 2018 Leipzig | 01:16:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
