Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chapman Jordan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chapman Jordan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chapman Jordan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chapman Jordan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:25 | 06:51 to 05:26 | 41.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:51 | 08:07 to 07:16 | 24.8% |
| Run Total | 00:30 | 46:35 to 46:05 | 14.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 04:52 to 04:35 | 8.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 03:28 to 03:11 | 8.3% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:05 to 04:59 | 2.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Chapman Jordan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:27 | 00:00 | 04:58 +01:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 06:27 | 04:36 +00:16 | 04:58 +01:29 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 11:19 | 05:24 +00:09 | 09:34 +01:45 |
| Sled Push | 03:28 | 16:52 | 03:14 +00:14 | 14:58 +01:54 |
| Running 3 | 06:05 | 20:20 | 05:54 +00:11 | 18:12 +02:08 |
| Sled Pull | 06:51 | 26:25 | 05:38 +01:13 | 24:06 +02:19 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 33:16 | 05:54 +00:08 | 29:44 +03:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:21 | 39:18 | 06:19 -00:58 | 35:38 +03:40 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 44:39 | 06:08 +00:26 | 41:57 +02:42 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 51:13 | 05:03 +00:02 | 48:05 +03:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:55 | 56:18 | 05:56 -00:01 | 53:08 +03:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 01:02:13 | 02:27 -00:15 | 59:04 +03:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 01:04:25 | 05:56 -00:41 | 01:01:31 +02:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:40 | 01:09:40 | 05:54 -00:14 | 01:07:27 +02:13 |
| Running 8 | 04:48 | 01:15:20 | 06:49 -02:01 | 01:13:21 +01:59 |
| Wall Balls | 08:07 | 01:20:08 | 07:40 +00:27 | 01:20:10 -00:02 |
| Roxzone | 07:56 | 01:36:03 | 08:13 -00:17 | 01:36:03 |
Jordan Chapman finished in the top 64% of athletes in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, indicating a performance that is above the median. His total running time was 49 seconds faster than the average, suggesting a strong running profile with potential for further improvement in strength-based exercises. The standout running segment was Running 8, where Jordan was exceptionally fast, ranking in the 1st percentile. However, his initial pacing was slower, particularly in Running 1, which could indicate a conservative start. This suggests a need for balanced pacing and possibly an adjustment in race strategy to maintain speed without sacrificing strength performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rumsby Andrew | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:45 | |
| Bakker Koen | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:12 | |
| Claramonte Vercher Fernando | 2022 Valencia | 01:35:33 | |
| Damoy Hubert | 2023 Paris | 01:35:36 | |
| Roos Jan | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:36:26 | |
| Kibbler Chris | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:59 | |
| Riley Chris | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:35:33 | |
| Fisher Dean | 2020 Dallas | 01:35:41 | |
| White Gareth | 2024 Manchester | 01:35:52 | |
| Howell Allan | 2023 New York | 01:36:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:05:51 | |
| 2023 Dublin | 01:21:51 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:08:40 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:11:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
