Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mills Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mills Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mills Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mills Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:59 | 43:07 to 40:08 | 73.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:45 | 05:07 to 04:22 | 18.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 04:45 to 04:33 | 4.9% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:44 to 04:39 | 2.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 04:41 to 04:39 | 0.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 01:59 to 01:57 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Mills Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:10 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 05:10 | 04:24 -00:14 | 04:29 +00:41 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 09:20 | 04:48 -00:01 | 08:53 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 14:07 | 02:47 -00:36 | 13:41 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:43 | 16:18 | 05:12 +00:31 | 16:28 -00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 05:07 | 22:01 | 04:41 +00:26 | 21:40 +00:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 27:08 | 05:10 +00:18 | 26:21 +00:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:41 | 32:36 | 04:59 -00:18 | 31:31 +01:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 37:17 | 05:20 +00:11 | 36:30 +00:47 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 42:48 | 04:44 +00:00 | 41:50 +00:58 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 47:32 | 05:13 +00:13 | 46:34 +00:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 52:58 | 02:07 -00:08 | 51:47 +01:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 54:57 | 05:11 +00:16 | 53:54 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 01:00:24 | 04:52 -00:07 | 59:05 +01:19 |
| Running 8 | 05:39 | 01:05:09 | 05:42 -00:03 | 01:03:57 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 04:40 | 01:10:48 | 06:10 -01:30 | 01:09:39 +01:09 |
| Roxzone | 06:49 | 01:22:11 | 06:22 +00:27 | 01:22:11 |
From the splits analysis, it is evident that Steven's strengths lie in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where he performed faster than average. This suggests that he has good strength and power in these areas. However, there are several segments where he lost time compared to the average, including Running 1, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 7. This indicates that Steven may benefit from improving his running speed and endurance.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas for improvement, Steven Mills can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. Regular training that targets his running speed, endurance, and overall fitness will contribute to his success in the sport.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruffa Christian | 2024 Milan | 01:22:20 | |
| Van Dort Twan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:05 | |
| Longden David | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:22:14 | |
| Eugenia Alonso David | 2022 Madrid | 01:22:29 | |
| Schnittler Daniel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:50 | |
| Bahadorvand Hamun | 2022 Bremen | 01:22:37 | |
| Borggren Jonatan | 2023 Stockholm | 01:22:12 | |
| Ferriols Jose Daniel | 2024 Bilbao | 01:22:30 | |
| Galvin Sean | 2024 Paris | 01:22:08 | |
| Brechling Marcus | 2019 Leipzig | 01:22:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Barcelona | 01:20:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
