Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Köln using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcbride Catherine's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcbride Catherine's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcbride Catherine's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcbride Catherine's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:51 | 47:16 to 42:25 | 78.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:38 | 02:57 to 02:19 | 10.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 04:29 to 04:09 | 5.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:16 | 04:12 to 03:56 | 4.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 05:10 to 05:07 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:55 to 04:53 | 0.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Mcbride Catherine | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:14 | 00:00 | 04:52 -00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:55 | 04:14 | 05:00 -00:05 | 04:52 -00:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:58 | 09:09 | 05:15 +00:43 | 09:52 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 15:07 | 02:35 +00:22 | 15:07 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 06:17 | 18:04 | 05:30 +00:47 | 17:42 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 24:21 | 05:19 -01:26 | 23:12 +01:09 |
| Running 4 | 06:19 | 28:14 | 05:31 +00:48 | 28:31 -00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:10 | 34:33 | 05:31 -00:21 | 34:02 +00:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:19 | 39:43 | 05:39 +00:40 | 39:33 +00:10 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 46:02 | 05:14 -00:20 | 45:12 +00:50 |
| Running 6 | 06:27 | 50:56 | 05:33 +00:54 | 50:26 +00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 57:23 | 02:09 -00:16 | 55:59 +01:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:31 | 59:16 | 05:30 +01:01 | 58:08 +01:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:05:47 | 04:24 +00:05 | 01:03:38 +02:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:15 | 01:10:16 | 05:52 -00:37 | 01:08:02 +02:14 |
| Wall Balls | 04:12 | 01:15:31 | 04:26 -00:14 | 01:13:54 +01:37 |
| Roxzone | 05:02 | 01:24:36 | 06:16 -01:14 | 01:24:36 |
In terms of her splits, Catherine performed particularly well in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments, where she was faster than the average time. This suggests that she has good running and cardiovascular endurance. However, she struggled in several running segments, including Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 5, where she was slower than the average time. This indicates that she may need to work on her running speed and efficiency.
Overall, Catherine Mcbride has shown great potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving her running speed and endurance, as well as overall fitness, she can further enhance her performance. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, circuit training, and functional exercises, will help her address the areas that need improvement. With proper pacing, technique, and mental preparation, Catherine has the potential to achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrews Jess | 2023 Manchester | 01:24:35 | |
| Abel Molly | 2024 Anaheim | 01:24:51 | |
| Signorini Hanlie | 2023 London | 01:24:34 | |
| Parent Rebeka | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:24:55 | |
| Barney Alex | 2023 London | 01:24:06 | |
| Westerink Kim | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:13 | |
| Bowkett Pippa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:16 | |
| Evans Tanya | 2024 Sydney | 01:24:09 | |
| Aarsen Daphne | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:24:24 | |
| Sanz Santiago Purificacin | 2023 Malaga | 01:24:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
