Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Maren Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Maren Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Maren Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Maren Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:34 | 43:43 to 42:09 | 53.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:03 | 05:46 to 04:43 | 35.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:18 to 02:05 | 7.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:27 to 04:24 | 1.7% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:49 to 04:46 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Van Maren Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 04:41 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:42 | 04:28 -00:01 | 04:41 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 05:15 | 08:09 | 05:01 +00:14 | 09:09 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 13:24 | 02:56 -00:19 | 14:10 -00:46 |
| Running 3 | 05:26 | 16:01 | 05:26 +00:00 | 17:06 -01:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:46 | 21:27 | 05:00 +00:46 | 22:32 -01:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 27:13 | 05:26 +00:02 | 27:32 -00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:38 | 32:41 | 05:23 -00:45 | 32:58 -00:17 |
| Running 5 | 06:06 | 37:19 | 05:36 +00:30 | 38:21 -01:02 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 43:25 | 04:51 -00:02 | 43:57 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:53 | 48:14 | 05:29 +00:24 | 48:48 -00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 54:07 | 02:12 +00:06 | 54:17 -00:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 56:25 | 05:27 +00:23 | 56:29 -00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 01:02:15 | 05:10 -00:25 | 01:01:56 +00:19 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:07:00 | 06:06 +00:00 | 01:07:06 -00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 05:46 | 01:13:06 | 06:35 -00:49 | 01:13:12 -00:06 |
| Roxzone | 08:01 | 01:26:46 | 06:59 +01:02 | 01:26:46 |
Based on his splits, Paul excelled in the running segments, with his best running lap being 00:03:42, which was 00:49 faster than the average. This indicates that he has a strong running profile and should continue to focus on improving his running ability. However, his total running time of 00:43:43 was 02:01 slower than the average, suggesting that he could benefit from additional training in this area.
In conclusion, Paul Van Maren has shown strong performance in the Hyrox race, particularly in the running segments. However, there are areas where he can improve, such as his overall running time, transition time, and specific segments where he lost time. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Paul can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hesse John | 2023 Melbourne | 01:26:31 | |
| Spencer Joe | 2021 London | 01:26:50 | |
| Abd Hamid Abd Hanif | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:26:42 | |
| Lam Chunyuen | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:26:43 | |
| Miserus Mathijs | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:58 | |
| Visokoborskis Boriss | 2023 München | 01:26:28 | |
| Voeste Jan | 2022 Essen | 01:26:49 | |
| Mahon Ronan | 2023 Barcelona | 01:26:37 | |
| Smith Ben | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:26:37 | |
| Ridehalgh Paul | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:07 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
