Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 156 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Flohr Annemarie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Flohr Annemarie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Flohr Annemarie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Flohr Annemarie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:45 | 01:02:56 to 59:11 | 37.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:16 | 12:55 to 09:39 | 33.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:39 | 09:51 to 08:12 | 16.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:11 | 04:14 to 03:03 | 12.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 03:52 to 03:50 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:45 to 05:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:21 to 06:21 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:45 to 07:45 | 0.0% |
| Flohr Annemarie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:33 | 00:00 | 06:32 -01:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:45 | 04:33 | 05:42 +00:03 | 06:32 -01:59 |
| Running 2 | 07:19 | 10:18 | 07:13 +00:06 | 12:14 -01:56 |
| Sled Push | 03:52 | 17:37 | 03:48 +00:04 | 19:27 -01:50 |
| Running 3 | 07:35 | 21:29 | 07:50 -00:15 | 23:15 -01:46 |
| Sled Pull | 09:51 | 29:04 | 08:10 +01:41 | 31:05 -02:01 |
| Running 4 | 08:37 | 38:55 | 07:53 +00:44 | 39:15 -00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 12:55 | 47:32 | 10:18 +02:37 | 47:08 +00:24 |
| Running 5 | 08:48 | 01:00:27 | 08:22 +00:26 | 57:26 +03:01 |
| Rowing | 05:46 | 01:09:15 | 06:09 -00:23 | 01:05:48 +03:27 |
| Running 6 | 08:23 | 01:15:01 | 07:59 +00:24 | 01:11:57 +03:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:14 | 01:23:24 | 03:00 +01:14 | 01:19:56 +03:28 |
| Running 7 | 08:41 | 01:27:38 | 08:09 +00:32 | 01:22:56 +04:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:21 | 01:36:19 | 07:26 -01:05 | 01:31:05 +05:14 |
| Running 8 | 09:03 | 01:42:40 | 09:22 -00:19 | 01:38:31 +04:09 |
| Wall Balls | 07:45 | 01:51:43 | 08:24 -00:39 | 01:47:53 +03:50 |
| Roxzone | 07:24 | 02:06:44 | 10:27 -03:03 | 02:06:44 |
Based on the splits analysis, Annemarie's best running lap was 00:04:33, which was 01:43 faster than the average. This indicates that she has good running ability and can capitalize on this strength. However, her total running time of 01:02:56 was 01:15 slower than average, suggesting that she could benefit from improving her running endurance and speed.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Annemarie Flohr can enhance her performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Romeijnkeeman Kittie | 2023 Rotterdam | 02:06:28 | |
| Usta Alev | 2023 Glasgow | 02:06:19 | |
| Saleem Naheed | 2024 Manchester | 02:06:24 | |
| Van Leeuwen Denise | 2024 Rotterdam | 02:06:56 | |
| Dähn Katharina | 2018 Hamburg | 02:06:27 | |
| Van Dalen Natasja | 2023 Rotterdam | 02:06:34 | |
| Page Tara | 2022 Dallas | 02:07:05 | |
| Shannon Ceile | 2024 Melbourne | 02:06:29 | |
| Schroeder Priscilla | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:06:41 | |
| Walker Eliza | 2022 Dallas | 02:06:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 02:16:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
