Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 243 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Yilmaz Ferat's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Yilmaz Ferat's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Yilmaz Ferat's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Yilmaz Ferat's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:19 | 01:05:42 to 56:23 | 75.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:54 | 10:20 to 08:26 | 15.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:07 | 08:53 to 07:46 | 9.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:20 to 03:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:53 to 05:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:51 to 02:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:30 to 07:30 | 0.0% |
| Yilmaz Ferat | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:32 | 00:00 | 05:49 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 05:32 | 04:58 -00:12 | 05:49 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 07:28 | 10:18 | 06:44 +00:44 | 10:47 -00:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:20 | 17:46 | 04:01 -00:41 | 17:31 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 09:16 | 21:06 | 07:36 +01:40 | 21:32 -00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:53 | 30:22 | 07:11 -01:18 | 29:08 +01:14 |
| Running 4 | 08:44 | 36:15 | 07:34 +01:10 | 36:19 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:20 | 44:59 | 08:54 +01:26 | 43:53 +01:06 |
| Running 5 | 08:31 | 55:19 | 08:05 +00:26 | 52:47 +02:32 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 01:03:50 | 05:40 -00:39 | 01:00:52 +02:58 |
| Running 6 | 08:07 | 01:08:51 | 07:46 +00:21 | 01:06:32 +02:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:51 | 01:16:58 | 03:03 -00:12 | 01:14:18 +02:40 |
| Running 7 | 08:13 | 01:19:49 | 07:49 +00:24 | 01:17:21 +02:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:53 | 01:28:02 | 08:09 +00:44 | 01:25:10 +02:52 |
| Running 8 | 09:55 | 01:36:55 | 09:56 -00:01 | 01:33:19 +03:36 |
| Wall Balls | 07:30 | 01:46:50 | 10:29 -02:59 | 01:43:15 +03:35 |
| Roxzone | 11:04 | 02:05:15 | 11:31 -00:27 | 02:05:15 |
Based on the splits analysis, Ferat showed strengths in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where he performed faster than the average. However, he struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 2, Running 3, and Running 4, where he was significantly slower than the average. This suggests that Ferat should focus on improving his running ability.
In summary, Ferat Yilmaz had a commendable performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on improving his running speed, endurance, and overall strength, Ferat can enhance his performance in the identified segments. Implementing effective race strategies, such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation, will further contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Llorente Jesus | 2023 Dublin | 02:05:33 | |
| Oliveira Da Cruz Leonardo | 2024 Bilbao | 02:05:02 | |
| Davies Richard | 2024 Copenhagen | 02:05:18 | |
| Moiseienico Yurii | 2023 Warschau | 02:05:34 | |
| Hughes Alan | 2024 Dublin | 02:05:36 | |
| Garner Scott | 2024 Manchester | 02:04:45 | |
| Eriksson Mårten | 2023 Stockholm | 02:05:39 | |
| Dang DangKhoa | 2024 Berlin | 02:05:04 | |
| Núñez García Daniel | 2024 Madrid | 02:05:19 | |
| Smith Chris | 2023 Birmingham | 02:05:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
