Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 248 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Stabb Julie's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Stabb Julie hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Stabb Julie’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stabb Julie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 14:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:59 | 01:07:18 to 57:19 | 69.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:00 | 13:08 to 09:08 | 27.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 07:03 to 06:42 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Stabb Julie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:58 | 00:00 | 06:12 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 06:58 | 05:37 -00:30 | 06:12 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 07:16 | 12:05 | 06:48 +00:28 | 11:49 +00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 19:21 | 03:38 -01:06 | 18:37 +00:44 |
| Running 3 | 07:31 | 21:53 | 07:25 +00:06 | 22:15 -00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 29:24 | 07:50 -03:17 | 29:40 -00:16 |
| Running 4 | 07:58 | 33:57 | 07:31 +00:27 | 37:30 -03:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 13:08 | 41:55 | 09:28 +03:40 | 45:01 -03:06 |
| Running 5 | 08:50 | 55:03 | 07:49 +01:01 | 54:29 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 01:03:53 | 06:04 -00:38 | 01:02:18 +01:35 |
| Running 6 | 10:59 | 01:09:19 | 07:40 +03:19 | 01:08:22 +00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 01:20:18 | 02:53 -00:34 | 01:16:02 +04:16 |
| Running 7 | 08:21 | 01:22:37 | 07:43 +00:38 | 01:18:55 +03:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:03 | 01:30:58 | 07:02 +00:01 | 01:26:38 +04:20 |
| Running 8 | 09:28 | 01:38:01 | 08:49 +00:39 | 01:33:40 +04:21 |
| Wall Balls | 04:43 | 01:47:29 | 07:31 -02:48 | 01:42:29 +05:00 |
| Roxzone | 08:08 | 02:00:11 | 10:11 -02:03 | 02:00:11 |
Julie's total running time of 01:07:18 was 08:25 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that she may need to improve her overall fitness and transition time to reduce the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:06:58 was 00:52 slower than average, indicating that there is room for improvement in her running performance.
In conclusion, Julie Stabb had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where she can improve to enhance her performance in future races. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as improving her running performance, strengthening her upper body for burpees broad jump, and working on her endurance and speed, she can elevate her performance and achieve better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Coyle Lauren | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:00:39 | |
| Weber Katrin | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:59:53 | |
| Ercillo Jade | 2024 Dubai | 02:00:05 | |
| Martinez Gutierrez Veronica | 2023 Malaga | 02:00:08 | |
| Schaap Sabrina | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:00:04 | |
| Wolfram Josie | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:00:06 | |
| Hill Lisa | 2023 Manchester | 02:00:25 | |
| Mcintire Theresia | 2021 Dallas | 02:00:01 | |
| Roth Siobhan | 2023 München | 02:00:40 | |
| Siemsen Abbey | 2024 Melbourne | 02:00:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
