Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Scott Robert's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Scott Robert's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Scott Robert's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Scott Robert's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:57 | 07:34 to 05:37 | 51.3% |
| Run Total | 00:44 | 45:01 to 44:17 | 19.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:39 | 03:38 to 02:59 | 17.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:27 to 02:13 | 6.1% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:01 to 04:53 | 3.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:36 to 04:30 | 2.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:17 to 06:17 | 0.0% |
| Scott Robert | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 05:06 | 04:32 +00:04 | 04:46 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 09:42 | 05:13 +00:00 | 09:18 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 03:38 | 14:55 | 03:07 +00:31 | 14:31 +00:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 18:33 | 05:43 -00:14 | 17:38 +00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 24:02 | 05:19 -00:15 | 23:21 +00:41 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 29:06 | 05:41 -00:07 | 28:40 +00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:34 | 34:40 | 05:52 +01:42 | 34:21 +00:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:53 | 42:14 | 05:53 +00:00 | 40:13 +02:01 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 48:07 | 04:56 +00:05 | 46:06 +02:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 53:08 | 05:43 +00:03 | 51:02 +02:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 58:54 | 02:19 +00:08 | 56:45 +02:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 01:01:21 | 05:41 +00:03 | 59:04 +02:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:14 | 01:07:05 | 05:32 -00:18 | 01:04:45 +02:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:12:19 | 06:27 -00:07 | 01:10:17 +02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 06:17 | 01:18:39 | 07:09 -00:52 | 01:16:44 +01:55 |
| Roxzone | 06:42 | 01:31:29 | 07:36 -00:54 | 01:31:29 |
Segment Analysis:
- Total running time: 00:45:01 (01:22 slower than average)
- Best running lap: 00:05:06
In terms of running performance, Robert's total running time of 00:45:01 was 01:22 slower than the average. This suggests that he could benefit from focusing on improving his running abilities. His best running lap was 00:05:06, which was 00:29 slower than the average.
In conclusion, Robert Scott showed a strong performance in the Hyrox race in London. To further improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running abilities, particularly in segments where he lost the most time. Implementing specific training strategies, such as interval training, strength training, and plyometric exercises, will help enhance his overall fitness and race performance. Efficient transitions and familiarity with Hyrox-specific exercises will also contribute to better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Den Berg Niels | 2024 Maastricht | 01:31:11 | |
| Vogel Dominik | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:31:54 | |
| Wright Cameron | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:34 | |
| Niebla Ian | 2024 Dallas | 01:31:14 | |
| Coyle Danny | 2023 London | 01:31:58 | |
| Sevilla Lopez Paco | 2024 Madrid | 01:31:22 | |
| Mancuso Giulio | 2024 Rimini | 01:31:39 | |
| Gutierrez Michael | 2023 New York | 01:31:06 | |
| Schiller Robert | 2023 München | 01:31:13 | |
| Ford Paul | 2023 London | 01:31:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 London | 01:27:38 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
