Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Puczka Kacper's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Puczka Kacper's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Puczka Kacper's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Puczka Kacper's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:08 | 43:17 to 41:09 | 44.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:27 | 06:20 to 04:53 | 30.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:05 | 07:00 to 05:55 | 22.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:26 to 04:21 | 1.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:06 to 02:01 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Puczka Kacper | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:47 | 00:00 | 04:34 +01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 05:47 | 04:25 +00:01 | 04:34 +01:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 10:13 | 04:54 +00:11 | 08:59 +01:14 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 15:18 | 02:52 -01:07 | 13:53 +01:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:02 | 17:03 | 05:21 -00:19 | 16:45 +00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 03:36 | 22:05 | 04:51 -01:15 | 22:06 -00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 25:41 | 05:19 +00:09 | 26:57 -01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:20 | 31:09 | 05:12 +01:08 | 32:16 -01:07 |
| Running 5 | 05:29 | 37:29 | 05:29 +00:00 | 37:28 +00:01 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 42:58 | 04:47 -00:12 | 42:57 +00:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 47:33 | 05:20 -00:08 | 47:44 -00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 52:45 | 02:08 -00:02 | 53:04 -00:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:07 | 54:51 | 05:20 -00:13 | 55:12 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:50 | 59:58 | 04:59 -01:09 | 01:00:32 -00:34 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:03:48 | 05:55 +00:15 | 01:05:31 -01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 07:00 | 01:09:58 | 06:20 +00:40 | 01:11:26 -01:28 |
| Roxzone | 07:36 | 01:24:27 | 06:41 +00:55 | 01:24:27 |
Kacper Puczka put up a commendable performance in the 2024 Poznan HYROX, placing within the top 47% of all athletes and within the top 48% in his age group. His overall time was 01:24:27, with his total running time being 00:43:17, which is 00:54 slower than the average. Pacing throughout the race appeared to be a notable issue, as he started slower than the average in the first running segment but managed to speed up in some of the later segments. Kacper seems to have a hybrid profile, showing both strength and endurance with a slight leaning towards strength.
For enhanced race performance, Kacper should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Geyer Florian | 2022 Hamburg | 01:24:55 | |
| Green James | 2019 New York | 01:24:12 | |
| Andrews James | 2024 Dubai | 01:24:06 | |
| Flanagan Conor | 2024 Anaheim | 01:24:40 | |
| Neuser Jonas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:40 | |
| Crisman Alex | 2022 Chicago | 01:24:47 | |
| Borregón Sundberg Iker | 2023 Malaga | 01:23:58 | |
| Adams Jack | 2024 Brisbane | 01:23:58 | |
| Perez Lugo Cesar | 2024 Mexico City | 01:24:40 | |
| Hutauruk Ronaldo | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:24:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Katowice | 01:40:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
