Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Oberhausen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nägler Guido's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nägler Guido's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nägler Guido's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nägler Guido's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:24 | 07:49 to 05:25 | 43.0% |
| Run Total | 01:59 | 41:03 to 39:04 | 35.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:46 | 05:11 to 04:25 | 13.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 04:48 to 04:22 | 7.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:37 to 01:37 | 0.0% |
| Nägler Guido | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:23 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 04:29 | 04:21 -00:09 | 04:23 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:41 | 04:43 +00:17 | 08:44 -00:03 |
| Sled Push | 01:54 | 13:41 | 02:44 -00:50 | 13:27 +00:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 15:35 | 05:06 +00:17 | 16:11 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 04:06 | 20:58 | 04:33 -00:27 | 21:17 -00:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 25:04 | 05:05 +00:18 | 25:50 -00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:11 | 30:27 | 04:50 +00:21 | 30:55 -00:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 35:38 | 05:14 +00:01 | 35:45 -00:07 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 40:53 | 04:40 -00:07 | 40:59 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 45:26 | 05:06 +00:18 | 45:39 -00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:37 | 50:50 | 02:02 -00:25 | 50:45 +00:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 52:27 | 05:05 +00:10 | 52:47 -00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:48 | 57:42 | 04:41 +00:07 | 57:52 -00:10 |
| Running 8 | 04:58 | 01:02:30 | 05:34 -00:36 | 01:02:33 -00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 07:49 | 01:07:28 | 05:56 +01:53 | 01:08:07 -00:39 |
| Roxzone | 05:01 | 01:20:10 | 06:07 -01:06 | 01:20:10 |
In terms of his splits, Guido's total running time of 00:41:03 was 02:10 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap of 00:04:29 shows potential for improvement.
Overall, Guido Nägler has shown great potential in the Hyrox race. By addressing the areas of improvement mentioned above and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gsaller Hartwig | 2023 München | 01:20:07 | |
| Raaijmakers Rocky | 2024 Maastricht | 01:20:13 | |
| Stichnoth Tobias | 2023 München | 01:19:49 | |
| Leitschuh Maurice | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:20:19 | |
| Lake Marcus | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:58 | |
| Delgado Aponte Adolfo | 2024 Mexico City | 01:19:50 | |
| Di Marco Paolo | 2024 Milan | 01:20:26 | |
| Harris Nathan | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:20:19 | |
| Engelhardt Fabian | 2023 München | 01:20:19 | |
| Suchenek Janusz | 2024 Gdansk | 01:20:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Essen | 01:49:14 | |
| 2022 Essen | 01:48:02 | |
| 2019 Essen | 01:17:57 | |
| 2018 Essen | 01:32:18 | |
| 2019 Hannover | 01:23:41 | |
| 2022 München | 01:42:07 | |
| WorldChampionship - Leipzig | 01:41:24 | |
| 2024 Stuttgart | 01:42:25 | |
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:39:54 | |
| 2024 Köln | 01:50:58 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:26 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:43:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
