Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire White Rory's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights White Rory's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the White Rory's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve White Rory's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:15 | 45:54 to 40:39 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| White Rory | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:31 +00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 04:44 | 04:24 -00:10 | 04:31 +00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 08:58 | 04:52 +00:09 | 08:55 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 01:43 | 13:59 | 02:51 -01:08 | 13:47 +00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 15:42 | 05:17 -00:01 | 16:38 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 04:19 | 20:58 | 04:47 -00:28 | 21:55 -00:57 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 25:17 | 05:15 +00:12 | 26:42 -01:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:59 | 30:44 | 05:05 -01:06 | 31:57 -01:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 34:43 | 05:25 +00:35 | 37:02 -02:19 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 40:43 | 04:46 -00:07 | 42:27 -01:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 45:22 | 05:17 +00:22 | 47:13 -01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 51:01 | 02:08 -00:09 | 52:30 -01:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:49 | 53:00 | 05:16 +00:33 | 54:38 -01:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:02 | 58:49 | 04:56 -00:54 | 59:54 -01:05 |
| Running 8 | 08:00 | 01:02:51 | 05:49 +02:11 | 01:04:50 -01:59 |
| Wall Balls | 05:28 | 01:10:51 | 06:17 -00:49 | 01:10:39 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 07:16 | 01:23:28 | 06:32 +00:44 | 01:23:28 |
Rory White demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne HYROX event, ranking in the top 27% of his age group. His strengths were notably in the strength-based exercises, such as the Sled Push (3rd percentile) and Burpees Broad Jump (16th percentile), highlighting his solid strength capabilities. However, his total running time was 3:50 slower than average, indicating that running is an area that requires attention. Additionally, his pacing analysis revealed he started off relatively well but showed a significant slowdown in the latter running segments, especially Running 8, where he was 2:07 slower than average. This suggests a potential endurance issue or fatigue management that needs addressing. Overall, Rory's profile leans towards a strength athlete who would benefit from enhanced running and endurance training to develop a more hybrid performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Duineveld Peter | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:00 | |
| Meng Felix | 2022 Leipzig | 01:23:57 | |
| Della Rossa Gianfranco | 2023 Rimini | 01:23:15 | |
| Searston John | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:57 | |
| Owens David | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:29 | |
| Lincoln Jack | 2024 New York | 01:22:58 | |
| Winterbottom Kyle | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:03 | |
| Wilson Lachlan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:47 | |
| Dumant Thomas | 2024 Paris | 01:23:08 | |
| Costa David | 2024 Sydney | 01:23:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
