Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Phillips Reece's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Phillips Reece's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Phillips Reece's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Phillips Reece's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:28 | 07:08 to 04:40 | 28.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:06 | 06:54 to 04:48 | 24.5% |
| Sled Pull | 01:48 | 06:17 to 04:29 | 21.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:32 | 03:31 to 01:59 | 17.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 03:01 to 02:37 | 4.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:32 to 04:20 | 2.3% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:45 to 04:41 | 0.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:43 to 35:43 | 0.0% |
| Phillips Reece | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:41 | 00:00 | 04:32 +00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:41 | 04:24 +00:08 | 04:32 +00:09 |
| Running 2 | 04:00 | 09:13 | 04:52 -00:52 | 08:56 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 13:13 | 02:52 +00:09 | 13:48 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 04:23 | 16:14 | 05:17 -00:54 | 16:40 -00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 20:37 | 04:48 +01:29 | 21:57 -01:20 |
| Running 4 | 04:28 | 26:54 | 05:15 -00:47 | 26:45 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:54 | 31:22 | 05:06 +01:48 | 32:00 -00:38 |
| Running 5 | 04:32 | 38:16 | 05:25 -00:53 | 37:06 +01:10 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 42:48 | 04:46 -00:01 | 42:31 +00:17 |
| Running 6 | 04:24 | 47:33 | 05:17 -00:53 | 47:17 +00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:31 | 51:57 | 02:08 +01:23 | 52:34 -00:37 |
| Running 7 | 04:26 | 55:28 | 05:16 -00:50 | 54:42 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:08 | 59:54 | 04:56 +02:12 | 59:58 -00:04 |
| Running 8 | 04:54 | 01:07:02 | 05:51 -00:57 | 01:04:54 +02:08 |
| Wall Balls | 05:49 | 01:11:56 | 06:17 -00:28 | 01:10:45 +01:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:04 | 01:23:40 | 06:38 -00:34 | 01:23:40 |
Reece Phillips put forth a commendable effort in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, finishing in the top 29% of all participants, and the top 36% for his age group (30-34). He showed great prowess in his running, finishing with a total running time of 00:35:43, which was 06:19 faster than the average. His best running lap was 00:04:00, demonstrating his exceptional speed and endurance.
His overall pacing strategy seemed to be fairly balanced, with the exception of the initial running segment where he started slightly slower than the average. However, he quickly made up for this in the following running segments. Reece's performance profile suggests that he is more inclined towards running, with a need to focus on strength-based exercises to improve his overall results.
Reece should consider implementing the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thien Julian | 2018 Essen | 01:23:27 | |
| Van Wingerden Rik | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:27 | |
| Tan Wai Jue | 2024 London | 01:23:30 | |
| Field Ryan | 2022 London | 01:23:24 | |
| Mcmaster Robert | 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:25 | |
| Morariu Liviu | 2022 London | 01:23:28 | |
| Licuria Paul | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:11 | |
| Flude Lachlan | 2024 Sydney | 01:23:27 | |
| Hernanz Sánchez Cesar Jorge | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:05 | |
| Mulder Milan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:23:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
