Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 379 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcnally Steve's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcnally Steve's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcnally Steve's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcnally Steve's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 15:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 14:53 | 01:09:44 to 54:51 | 95.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 08:09 to 07:27 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:16 to 07:16 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Mcnally Steve | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:43 | 00:00 | 05:35 +02:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 07:43 | 04:54 -00:27 | 05:35 +02:08 |
| Running 2 | 08:07 | 12:10 | 06:20 +01:47 | 10:29 +01:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 20:17 | 04:00 -01:32 | 16:49 +03:28 |
| Running 3 | 07:56 | 22:45 | 07:12 +00:44 | 20:49 +01:56 |
| Sled Pull | 05:46 | 30:41 | 07:08 -01:22 | 28:01 +02:40 |
| Running 4 | 08:18 | 36:27 | 07:12 +01:06 | 35:09 +01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:16 | 44:45 | 08:23 -01:07 | 42:21 +02:24 |
| Running 5 | 08:21 | 52:01 | 07:41 +00:40 | 50:44 +01:17 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 01:00:22 | 05:32 -00:25 | 58:25 +01:57 |
| Running 6 | 08:30 | 01:05:29 | 07:14 +01:16 | 01:03:57 +01:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 01:13:59 | 02:55 -00:31 | 01:11:11 +02:48 |
| Running 7 | 08:49 | 01:16:23 | 07:19 +01:30 | 01:14:06 +02:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:09 | 01:25:12 | 07:51 +00:18 | 01:21:25 +03:47 |
| Running 8 | 12:03 | 01:33:21 | 09:18 +02:45 | 01:29:16 +04:05 |
| Wall Balls | 05:16 | 01:45:24 | 09:58 -04:42 | 01:38:34 +06:50 |
| Roxzone | 09:14 | 01:59:46 | 11:14 -02:00 | 01:59:46 |
Steve Mcnally's performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race shows a solid grasp of strength-based exercises, achieving impressive speed in segments like the Wall Balls and Sled Push, where he ranked at the top percentile. However, his overall running time was significantly slower than average, indicating that running is a key area for improvement. Notably, Steve's running times progressively slowed, suggesting he may have started too fast and lacked endurance in the later stages. While his transition time in the Roxzone was faster than average, indicating efficient transitions, the overall slower running time suggests a need for enhanced cardiovascular fitness and pacing strategy. Steve exhibits a hybrid profile with a strong inclination toward strength, but with room for improvement in running endurance and pacing.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| George Martin | 2023 London | 01:59:24 | |
| Jaquiéry Nathan | 2024 Milan | 02:00:09 | |
| Jenkins Will | 2022 Chicago | 01:59:23 | |
| Ler Puay Him | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:59:45 | |
| Lo Robin | 2023 Hong Kong | 02:00:13 | |
| Hsien Hwee Jonathan Tan | 2023 Singapore | 02:00:01 | |
| Lyons Mark | 2022 London | 02:00:08 | |
| Hoogesteger Mathijs | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:00:01 | |
| Makin Jim | 2022 Manchester | 01:59:23 | |
| Massey Niki | 2023 Dublin | 01:59:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
