Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 376 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jaquiéry Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jaquiéry Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jaquiéry Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jaquiéry Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 04:38 | 11:40 to 07:02 | 48.9% |
| Wall Balls | 02:31 | 12:23 to 09:52 | 26.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:39 | 04:40 to 03:01 | 17.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 04:26 to 04:09 | 3.0% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:44 to 05:29 | 2.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 05:06 to 04:57 | 1.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:40 to 06:40 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:02 to 07:02 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 51:40 to 51:40 | 0.0% |
| Jaquiéry Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:33 | 00:00 | 05:35 +00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:06 | 06:33 | 04:54 +00:12 | 05:35 +00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 11:39 | 06:21 -00:50 | 10:29 +01:10 |
| Sled Push | 04:26 | 17:10 | 04:00 +00:26 | 16:50 +00:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 21:36 | 07:15 -01:29 | 20:50 +00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 11:40 | 27:22 | 07:10 +04:30 | 28:05 -00:43 |
| Running 4 | 07:10 | 39:02 | 07:14 -00:04 | 35:15 +03:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:40 | 46:12 | 08:26 -01:46 | 42:29 +03:43 |
| Running 5 | 06:04 | 52:52 | 07:39 -01:35 | 50:55 +01:57 |
| Rowing | 05:44 | 58:56 | 05:30 +00:14 | 58:34 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:22 | 01:04:40 | 07:14 -00:52 | 01:04:04 +00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:40 | 01:11:02 | 02:54 +01:46 | 01:11:18 -00:16 |
| Running 7 | 06:21 | 01:15:42 | 07:19 -00:58 | 01:14:12 +01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:02 | 01:22:03 | 07:54 -00:52 | 01:21:31 +00:32 |
| Running 8 | 07:56 | 01:29:05 | 09:19 -01:23 | 01:29:25 -00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 12:23 | 01:37:01 | 10:08 +02:15 | 01:38:44 -01:43 |
| Roxzone | 10:53 | 02:00:09 | 11:17 -00:24 | 02:00:09 |
Nathan Jaquiéry demonstrated a commendable running capability, completing the total running segments significantly faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. His overall time of 02:00:09 placed him in the top 94% of all athletes, with a notable pace advantage in running segments compared to the average. However, his initial running segment (Running 1) was noticeably slower, suggesting a potentially conservative start. As the race progressed, Nathan's running splits improved dramatically, showcasing his capability to maintain and even accelerate his pace, a valuable trait for endurance events. Despite his running strength, Nathan's performance in strength-oriented exercises like the sled pull and wall balls suggests that there is room for improvement in these areas to achieve a more balanced fitness profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bong Kenny | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:00:08 | |
| Mcgovern Alfie | 2024 Perth | 01:59:44 | |
| Eames Jeff | 2024 Dallas | 02:00:25 | |
| Myers Robert | 2024 Anaheim | 02:00:07 | |
| Huynh Van | 2023 Melbourne | 02:00:28 | |
| Iazouguene Abdelnor | 2024 Bordeaux | 02:00:14 | |
| Perez Martinez Raul | 2023 Barcelona | 02:00:26 | |
| Salinas Dennis | 2024 Dallas | 01:59:43 | |
| Goertz Holger | 2023 Köln | 02:00:31 | |
| Pflugradt Marco | 2018 Hamburg | 02:00:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:47:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
