Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Angehrn Oliver's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Angehrn Oliver's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Angehrn Oliver's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Angehrn Oliver's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:54 | 44:13 to 41:19 | 57.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 06:05 to 04:55 | 23.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:49 | 06:47 to 05:58 | 16.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:33 to 04:22 | 3.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Angehrn Oliver | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 04:20 | 04:25 +00:08 | 04:35 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 08:53 | 04:55 +00:22 | 09:00 -00:07 |
| Sled Push | 01:55 | 14:10 | 02:51 -00:56 | 13:55 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 16:05 | 05:21 +00:11 | 16:46 -00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 04:15 | 21:37 | 04:51 -00:36 | 22:07 -00:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 25:52 | 05:20 +00:10 | 26:58 -01:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:05 | 31:22 | 05:15 +00:50 | 32:18 -00:56 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 37:27 | 05:30 +00:27 | 37:33 -00:06 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 43:24 | 04:47 -00:14 | 43:03 +00:21 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 47:57 | 05:21 +00:13 | 47:50 +00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 53:31 | 02:09 -00:20 | 53:11 +00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 55:20 | 05:21 +00:19 | 55:20 +00:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:07 | 01:01:00 | 05:02 -00:55 | 01:00:41 +00:19 |
| Running 8 | 06:26 | 01:05:07 | 05:56 +00:30 | 01:05:43 -00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 06:47 | 01:11:33 | 06:25 +00:22 | 01:11:39 -00:06 |
| Roxzone | 06:36 | 01:24:48 | 06:44 -00:08 | 01:24:48 |
Angehrn showed strength in certain segments, such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he performed significantly faster than the average time. However, he struggled in segments such as the Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 2, Running 8, Wall Balls, Running 7, and Running 6, where he lost considerable time compared to the average.
In conclusion, Oliver Angehrn performed well in the 2018 Stuttgart HYROX race, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on specific segments where he lost time, implementing targeted training strategies, and improving overall fitness and running speed, Angehrn can enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dominguez Fabian | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:15 | |
| Corry Ian | 2022 London | 01:24:45 | |
| Begue Grégory | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:13 | |
| Fuchs Sascha | 2023 München | 01:24:45 | |
| Bragoli Dan | 2021 Birmingham | 01:24:51 | |
| Oulmi Cyril | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:59 | |
| Thomas David | 2023 London | 01:25:08 | |
| Weislo Thomas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:16 | |
| Walker Peter | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:24:39 | |
| Moloney Paddy | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Hamburg | 01:21:11 | |
| 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:25:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
