Fuller Mark Performance Analysis

Dive into the performance of this athlete for 2022 London with this analyzer. We look at the performance of similar athletes to assess where are the weakness and the strengths of this athlete. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 768 similar athletes.

When comparing two athletes, remember that differing race track layouts can affect their running and roxzone times. The best strategy is to compare athletes who have raced in the same event.

Back to Fuller Mark view Omahoney Callum's full profile

Season 5 2022 London (1415) HYROX (289) Fuller Mark

GBR M 35-39 #132036 01:46:56 177th in AG | Top 61.2% 731st | Top 57.4%

Performance Highlights

Workout Total 43:49 -01:35
Running Total 51:21 -00:51
Roxzone 11:51 +02:26
Average Lap 06:25 -00:05
Best Lap 05:07 -00:14

Running

We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. Each segment’s time difference is highlighted: green for faster segments, red for slower ones. This gives a clear view of strengths and areas to improve, tailored to relevant performance peers.

Workouts

We break down workout times by comparing the athlete’s performance to others with matching finish times. Each workout segment displays a time difference: green for quicker and red for slower, offering a targeted look at competitive strengths and areas to refine.

Pacing Quality

This section showcases the entire Fuller Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average. It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fuller Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast (line below 0) or too slow (line above 0), guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.

Spread of Splits Time

This box plot illustrates the spread of splits for similar athletes, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fuller Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement. The chart include Top 10%, 25%, Median, and Bottom 25%, 10% of the distribution.

Improvement Plan

Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. We looked at the results of similar athletes to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fuller Mark's time.

The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.

A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.

Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.

Station Percentile Rank Potential Improvement Focus During Training
Roxzone 89 03:55 32.6%
Sandbag Lunges 97 03:41 30.7%
Run Total 42 02:02 16.9%
Burpees Broad Jump 63 01:37 13.5%
Wall Balls 35 00:30 4.2%
Sled Push 30 00:06 0.8%
Farmers Carry 31 00:05 0.7%
Rowing 32 00:04 0.6%
Ski Erg 0 00:00 0.0%
Sled Pull 5 00:00 0.0%

Progression Chart

Splits Time

Splits Time Time from Similar Athletes
Mark Callum Total Time Average Total Time
Running 1 05:07 03:37 πŸ† 05:07 05:21 -00:14 05:21 -00:14
Ski Erg 03:51 πŸ† 04:31 08:58 04:46 -00:55 10:07 -01:09
Running 2 05:10 πŸ† 05:57 14:08 05:54 -00:44 16:01 -01:53
Sled Push 03:02 πŸ† 04:26 17:10 03:34 -00:32 19:35 -02:25
Running 3 05:50 πŸ† 06:13 23:00 06:29 -00:39 26:04 -03:04
Sled Pull 04:19 πŸ† 09:42 27:19 06:18 -01:59 32:22 -05:03
Running 4 06:20 05:59 πŸ† 33:39 06:30 -00:10 38:52 -05:13
Burpees Broad Jump 07:41 πŸ† 08:09 41:20 07:10 +00:31 46:02 -04:42
Running 5 07:28 06:16 πŸ† 48:48 06:50 +00:38 52:52 -04:04
Rowing 05:05 πŸ† 05:11 53:53 05:17 -00:12 58:09 -04:16
Running 6 06:19 πŸ† 06:30 01:00:12 06:34 -00:15 01:04:43 -04:31
Farmers Carry 02:23 πŸ† 02:24 01:02:35 02:42 -00:19 01:07:25 -04:50
Running 7 06:33 πŸ† 06:37 01:09:08 06:33 +00:00 01:13:58 -04:50
Sandbag Lunges 09:34 05:17 πŸ† 01:18:42 06:46 +02:48 01:20:44 -02:02
Running 8 08:36 06:47 πŸ† 01:27:18 07:56 +00:40 01:28:40 -01:22
Wall Balls 07:54 πŸ† 09:41 01:35:12 08:51 -00:57 01:37:31 -02:19
Roxzone 11:51 09:16 πŸ† 01:46:56 09:25 +02:26 01:46:56

Comparing with 768 athletes

A word from your coach
Loading...

Loading...
Analysing the result... Wait a few second...
Similar Athletes
Lee Kevin 2023 Hong Kong 01:46:26 Compare
Magallanes Diego 2023 Dallas 01:46:26 Compare
Dela Cruz Ian 2022 Chicago 01:46:26 Compare
Omahoney Callum 2023 Dublin 01:46:26 Compare
Thompson Paul 2023 Birmingham 01:46:26 Compare
Johns Michael T 2023 New York 01:46:26 Compare
Olszewski Wojciech 2024 Katowice 01:46:26 Compare
Jimenez Blanco Javier 2024 Madrid 01:46:26 Compare
Pugliese Antonino 2024 Rimini 01:46:26 Compare
μ „ ν˜Έμ§„ 2024 Incheon 01:46:26 Compare

Measure Your Performance Against Top Athletes

Other Results from this athlete
No other results found for this athlete.

Ready to conquer your next race?

Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.

Pace Calculator

Share Your Result on Instagram

We've generated the perfect instagram story for you. Don't forget to tag us @roxcoach and redirect to your result page.

Download

Embrace Your Post-Race Recovery Journey

Discover the art of recovery with our expert tips. Tailored for Hyrox athletes, our guide ensures you rejuvenate effectively and return stronger for your next challenge.

Start My Recovery Plan