Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Martin Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Martin Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Martin Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Martin Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:22 | 44:21 to 40:59 | 72.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 05:12 to 04:31 | 14.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 02:55 to 02:38 | 6.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:37 to 04:21 | 5.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 04:46 to 04:42 | 1.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Martin Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:52 | 00:00 | 04:34 +01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 05:52 | 04:25 +00:12 | 04:34 +01:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 10:29 | 04:53 +00:14 | 08:59 +01:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 15:36 | 02:52 +00:03 | 13:52 +01:44 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 18:31 | 05:19 +00:14 | 16:44 +01:47 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 24:04 | 04:50 +00:22 | 22:03 +02:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 29:16 | 05:17 +00:11 | 26:53 +02:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:30 | 34:44 | 05:11 -00:41 | 32:10 +02:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 39:14 | 05:27 +00:14 | 37:21 +01:53 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 44:55 | 04:47 -00:13 | 42:48 +02:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 49:29 | 05:19 +00:07 | 47:35 +01:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 54:55 | 02:08 -00:19 | 52:54 +02:01 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 56:44 | 05:18 +00:13 | 55:02 +01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:46 | 01:02:15 | 04:59 -00:13 | 01:00:20 +01:55 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:07:01 | 05:53 -00:07 | 01:05:19 +01:42 |
| Wall Balls | 05:08 | 01:12:47 | 06:18 -01:10 | 01:11:12 +01:35 |
| Roxzone | 06:20 | 01:24:08 | 06:38 -00:18 | 01:24:08 |
Based on the splits analysis, Andrew's best running lap was 00:05:07, indicating his potential as a strong runner. However, there were several segments where he lost time compared to the average, including Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 5, and Running 7. These segments should be the focus of improvement in his training.
Additionally, Andrew should prioritize smooth and efficient transitions between the exercise zones to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Practicing quick and seamless transitions in training can help him improve his overall race time.
Lastly, Andrew should consider incorporating specific training sessions that simulate the race conditions. This can include completing Hyrox-style workouts that combine running and functional exercises to improve his ability to perform well under similar circumstances.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Andrew can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races and continue to improve his overall fitness and race results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Snodgrass Christian | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:34 | |
| Polet Simon | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:05 | |
| Freeman Ed | 2023 London | 01:24:35 | |
| Obrien Angus | 2023 London | 01:24:05 | |
| Alderson Paul | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:24 | |
| Lee Chengjie | 2023 Singapore | 01:24:28 | |
| Cosimi Amedeo | 2023 Rimini | 01:23:40 | |
| Goedbloed Niels | 2024 Maastricht | 01:24:01 | |
| Johansson Matt | 2024 Paris | 01:23:51 | |
| Jans Floris | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
