Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Basel using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Steigmeyer Simi's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Steigmeyer Simi's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Steigmeyer Simi's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Steigmeyer Simi's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:56 | 05:34 to 04:38 | 47.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:14 | 02:56 to 02:42 | 11.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 05:04 to 04:50 | 11.9% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:57 to 04:44 | 11.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:15 to 02:03 | 10.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:32 to 04:23 | 7.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:58 to 05:58 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:01 to 41:01 | 0.0% |
| Steigmeyer Simi | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:30 | 00:00 | 04:36 -00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:30 | 04:27 +00:05 | 04:36 -00:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 09:02 | 04:57 -00:05 | 09:03 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 13:54 | 02:55 +00:01 | 14:00 -00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 16:50 | 05:24 -00:04 | 16:55 -00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 22:10 | 04:57 +00:37 | 22:19 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 27:44 | 05:22 -00:04 | 27:16 +00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:32 | 33:02 | 05:19 -00:47 | 32:38 +00:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:18 | 37:34 | 05:33 -00:15 | 37:57 -00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 42:52 | 04:49 +00:08 | 43:30 -00:38 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 47:49 | 05:24 -00:12 | 48:19 -00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 53:01 | 02:11 +00:04 | 53:43 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 55:16 | 05:23 -00:25 | 55:54 -00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:04 | 01:00:14 | 05:06 -00:02 | 01:01:17 -01:03 |
| Running 8 | 05:36 | 01:05:18 | 05:59 -00:23 | 01:06:23 -01:05 |
| Wall Balls | 05:58 | 01:10:54 | 06:31 -00:33 | 01:12:22 -01:28 |
| Roxzone | 09:00 | 01:25:45 | 06:52 +02:08 | 01:25:45 |
Simi's best running lap was 00:04:30, indicating that he is capable of maintaining a strong pace during the race. His splits analysis shows that he performed well in several segments, such as the sled push, running 2, running 3, burpees broad jump, running 5, farmers carry, running 7, running 8, and wall balls, where he was faster than the average time.
In conclusion, Simi Steigmeyer had a strong performance in the HYROX race in Basel. While he performed well in several segments, there are areas for improvement, including the Roxzone, sled pull, and rowing segments. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transition efficiency, strength, cardiovascular endurance, and technique, Simi can enhance his performance in these areas and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Deubert Felix | 2018 Hamburg | 01:25:40 | |
| Simpson David | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:38 | |
| Herwédé Axel | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:25:45 | |
| Brodersen Andreas | 2019 Hamburg | 01:26:14 | |
| Brunjak Ivor | 2023 Barcelona | 01:26:04 | |
| Roberts Joe | 2024 Dallas | 01:25:56 | |
| Van Brakel Maurits | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:25:58 | |
| Price John | 2023 London | 01:25:53 | |
| Piperi Steve | 2024 Turin | 01:25:16 | |
| Almadani Mohammed | 2023 Manchester | 01:25:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
