Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcginn Peter's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcginn Peter's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcginn Peter's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcginn Peter's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:33 | 06:31 to 04:58 | 45.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:51 | 05:39 to 04:48 | 24.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:24 | 05:00 to 04:36 | 11.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 03:04 to 02:41 | 11.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:16 to 02:02 | 6.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:08 to 41:08 | 0.0% |
| Mcginn Peter | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 05:31 | 04:26 -00:11 | 04:35 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 09:46 | 04:55 -00:10 | 09:01 +00:45 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 14:31 | 02:51 +00:13 | 13:56 +00:35 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 17:35 | 05:22 -00:24 | 16:47 +00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 05:00 | 22:33 | 04:53 +00:07 | 22:09 +00:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 27:33 | 05:20 -00:15 | 27:02 +00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:31 | 32:38 | 05:16 +01:15 | 32:22 +00:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 39:09 | 05:30 -00:25 | 37:38 +01:31 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 44:14 | 04:48 -00:11 | 43:08 +01:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 48:51 | 05:21 -00:11 | 47:56 +00:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 54:01 | 02:10 +00:06 | 53:17 +00:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 56:17 | 05:21 -00:11 | 55:27 +00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:39 | 01:01:27 | 05:02 +00:37 | 01:00:48 +00:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:28 | 01:07:06 | 05:57 -00:29 | 01:05:50 +01:16 |
| Wall Balls | 04:59 | 01:12:34 | 06:27 -01:28 | 01:11:47 +00:47 |
| Roxzone | 07:32 | 01:24:57 | 06:43 +00:49 | 01:24:57 |
Peter Mcginn demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. His overall rank stands in the top 32% of all athletes and he secured a position in the top 38% in his age group. His overall time was 01:24:57, which showcases his endurance and fitness level.
Peter's total running time was 00:41:08, faster by 01:28 than the average, which indicates that he is a strong runner. His best running lap was completed in 00:04:45. An analysis of his splits from running 1 to running 4 reveals that Peter started slower than the average but consistently improved his speed in the subsequent running segments. This indicates a solid pacing strategy, as he successfully avoided an early burnout by starting at a steady pace and gradually increasing his speed.
To improve overall performance, consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Restall Conor | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:16 | |
| Laurent Alexis | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:03 | |
| Łobacz Michał | 2024 Poznan | 01:25:03 | |
| Van Dillen Lex | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:53 | |
| Arnott Stephen | 2022 Manchester | 01:24:30 | |
| Heurs Thorben | 2023 Hamburg | 01:25:25 | |
| CondãºN Kevin | 2023 Sydney | 01:24:47 | |
| Brown Sawyer | 2022 New York | 01:25:10 | |
| Tocco Raphael | 2024 Paris | 01:25:11 | |
| Zellner Benedikt | 2023 München | 01:25:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:38:07 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:31:43 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:03 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
