Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Allan Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Allan Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Allan Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Allan Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:04 | 55:54 to 48:50 | 83.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 | 06:28 to 05:57 | 6.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 03:58 to 03:29 | 5.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 03:01 to 02:34 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Allan Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:52 | 00:00 | 05:11 -00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 04:52 | 04:41 -00:05 | 05:11 -00:19 |
| Running 2 | 06:03 | 09:28 | 05:43 +00:20 | 09:52 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 03:58 | 15:31 | 03:30 +00:28 | 15:35 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 06:42 | 19:29 | 06:17 +00:25 | 19:05 +00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 06:28 | 26:11 | 06:05 +00:23 | 25:22 +00:49 |
| Running 4 | 07:01 | 32:39 | 06:16 +00:45 | 31:27 +01:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:15 | 39:40 | 06:54 -01:39 | 37:43 +01:57 |
| Running 5 | 07:08 | 44:55 | 06:32 +00:36 | 44:37 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 52:03 | 05:11 -00:25 | 51:09 +00:54 |
| Running 6 | 07:11 | 56:49 | 06:22 +00:49 | 56:20 +00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:01 | 01:04:00 | 02:35 +00:26 | 01:02:42 +01:18 |
| Running 7 | 07:32 | 01:07:01 | 06:19 +01:13 | 01:05:17 +01:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:20 | 01:14:33 | 06:26 -01:06 | 01:11:36 +02:57 |
| Running 8 | 09:29 | 01:19:53 | 07:27 +02:02 | 01:18:02 +01:51 |
| Wall Balls | 05:30 | 01:29:22 | 08:17 -02:47 | 01:25:29 +03:53 |
| Roxzone | 08:01 | 01:42:45 | 08:59 -00:58 | 01:42:45 |
Based on the splits analysis, Scott's total running time of 00:55:54 was 07:25 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus more on his running ability to improve his overall performance. His best running lap of 00:04:52 was faster than average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in this area with the right training.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheta Cj | 2024 Marseille | 01:42:42 | |
| Grothusen Sven | 2021 Hamburg | 01:43:01 | |
| Prettner Cyril | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:43:11 | |
| Mevlani Grid | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:42:56 | |
| Sabalburo Ed | 2024 Anaheim | 01:43:08 | |
| Pascal Jonathan | 2023 München | 01:43:03 | |
| Ross Jesse | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:14 | |
| Quarta Stefano | 2024 Turin | 01:42:36 | |
| Affek Krystian | 2023 Malmö | 01:42:47 | |
| De La Viuda Manzanal Alfonso | 2023 Madrid | 01:42:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:33:28 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:38:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
