Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mc Callion Conor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mc Callion Conor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mc Callion Conor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mc Callion Conor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:57 | 46:14 to 44:17 | 80.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:21 | 03:20 to 02:59 | 14.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 05:27 to 05:19 | 5.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:06 to 06:06 | 0.0% |
| Mc Callion Conor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:35 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 03:35 | 04:33 -00:12 | 04:47 -01:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:48 | 07:56 | 05:16 +00:32 | 09:20 -01:24 |
| Sled Push | 03:20 | 13:44 | 03:08 +00:12 | 14:36 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 06:04 | 17:04 | 05:45 +00:19 | 17:44 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:57 | 23:08 | 05:24 -00:27 | 23:29 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 06:09 | 28:05 | 05:44 +00:25 | 28:53 -00:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:00 | 34:14 | 05:57 -00:57 | 34:37 -00:23 |
| Running 5 | 06:16 | 39:14 | 05:56 +00:20 | 40:34 -01:20 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 45:30 | 04:58 -00:08 | 46:30 -01:00 |
| Running 6 | 06:39 | 50:20 | 05:47 +00:52 | 51:28 -01:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 56:59 | 02:22 -00:20 | 57:15 -00:16 |
| Running 7 | 06:39 | 59:01 | 05:44 +00:55 | 59:37 -00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:27 | 01:05:40 | 05:34 -00:07 | 01:05:21 +00:19 |
| Running 8 | 05:08 | 01:11:07 | 06:31 -01:23 | 01:10:55 +00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 06:06 | 01:16:15 | 07:12 -01:06 | 01:17:26 -01:11 |
| Roxzone | 10:02 | 01:32:14 | 07:36 +02:26 | 01:32:14 |
Conor Mc Callion performed impressively in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race, finishing within the top 46% of athletes and 54% within his age group of 35-39. He exhibited a hybrid profile, displaying both running and strength skills. In terms of pacing, Conor started the race exceptionally fast in the Running 1 segment, ranking 4th percentile, which was significantly quicker than the average. However, his total running time was slower than the average, suggesting that he may have started too quickly and struggled to maintain this pace throughout the subsequent running segments.
Conor should consider implementing the following race strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Weiss Philipp | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:32:33 | |
| González Castro Jaime | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:21 | |
| Lisk Leigh | 2024 Cape Town | 01:31:56 | |
| Gerage Alex | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:32:26 | |
| Guano Massimo | 2023 Milan | 01:32:43 | |
| Gogolitsyn Vladimir | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:32:13 | |
| Munoz Edgar | 2023 Melbourne | 01:32:08 | |
| Bogdevic Tomas | 2024 Poznan | 01:32:32 | |
| Splettstößer Daniel | 2023 Köln | 01:32:19 | |
| Flynn Graham | 2024 Dublin | 01:32:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:43 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
