Hens I Performance Analysis

Dive into the performance of this athlete for 2022 Maastricht with this analyzer. We look at the performance of similar athletes to assess where are the weakness and the strengths of this athlete. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 492 similar athletes.

When comparing two athletes, remember that differing race track layouts can affect their running and roxzone times. The best strategy is to compare athletes who have raced in the same event.

Back to Hens I view Balducci Gabriele's full profile

Season 4 2022 Maastricht (472) HYROX (20) Hens I

NED M 50-54 #103519 01:54:54 18th in AG | Top 90.0% 230th | Top 68.2%

Performance Highlights

Workout Total 39:03 -09:15
Running Total 01:46:15 +50:11
Roxzone 04:41 -06:00
Average Lap 08:54 +01:55
Best Lap 04:00 -01:36

Running

We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. Each segment’s time difference is highlighted: green for faster segments, red for slower ones. This gives a clear view of strengths and areas to improve, tailored to relevant performance peers.

Workouts

We break down workout times by comparing the athlete’s performance to others with matching finish times. Each workout segment displays a time difference: green for quicker and red for slower, offering a targeted look at competitive strengths and areas to refine.

Pacing Quality

This section showcases the entire Hens I's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average. It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hens I's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast (line below 0) or too slow (line above 0), guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.

Spread of Splits Time

This box plot illustrates the spread of splits for similar athletes, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hens I's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement. The chart include Top 10%, 25%, Median, and Bottom 25%, 10% of the distribution.

Improvement Plan

Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. We looked at the results of similar athletes to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hens I's time.

The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.

A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.

Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.

Station Percentile Rank Potential Improvement Focus During Training
Run Total 100 53:42 97.5%
Sled Push 56 00:41 1.2%
Rowing 52 00:16 0.5%
Ski Erg 50 00:14 0.4%
Wall Balls 30 00:13 0.4%
Sled Pull 4 00:00 0.0%
Burpees Broad Jump 7 00:00 0.0%
Farmers Carry 9 00:00 0.0%
Sandbag Lunges 5 00:00 0.0%
Roxzone 1 00:00 0.0%

Progression Chart

Splits Time

Splits Time Time from Similar Athletes
I Gabriele Total Time Average Total Time
Running 1 05:15 πŸ† 06:09 05:15 05:32 -00:17 05:32 -00:17
Ski Erg 04:52 πŸ† 05:16 10:07 04:52 +00:00 10:24 -00:17
Running 2 04:00 πŸ† 05:18 14:07 06:16 -02:16 16:40 -02:33
Sled Push 03:45 πŸ† 05:30 17:52 03:48 -00:03 20:28 -02:36
Running 3 04:16 πŸ† 06:09 22:08 07:01 -02:45 27:29 -05:21
Sled Pull 04:32 πŸ† 06:03 26:40 06:38 -02:06 34:07 -07:27
Running 4 04:17 πŸ† 06:09 30:57 06:56 -02:39 41:03 -10:06
Burpees Broad Jump 05:16 πŸ† 10:34 36:13 07:57 -02:41 49:00 -12:47
Running 5 04:29 πŸ† 07:29 40:42 07:19 -02:50 56:19 -15:37
Rowing 05:24 πŸ† 05:58 46:06 05:25 -00:01 01:01:44 -15:38
Running 6 04:29 πŸ† 06:30 50:35 07:01 -02:32 01:08:45 -18:10
Farmers Carry 02:04 πŸ† 02:53 52:39 02:54 -00:50 01:11:39 -19:00
Running 7 04:29 πŸ† 06:39 57:08 07:02 -02:33 01:18:41 -21:33
Sandbag Lunges 05:03 πŸ† 07:20 01:02:11 07:18 -02:15 01:25:59 -23:48
Running 8 40:03 06:28 πŸ† 01:42:14 08:48 +31:15 01:34:47 +07:27
Wall Balls 08:07 07:09 πŸ† 01:50:21 09:26 -01:19 01:44:13 +06:08
Roxzone 04:41 πŸ† 12:58 01:54:54 10:41 -06:00 01:54:54

Comparing with 492 athletes

A word from your coach
Loading...

Loading...
Analysing the result... Wait a few second...
Similar Athletes
Habener Joshua 2020 Hannover 01:54:24 Compare
Fiore Paolo 2023 Milan 01:54:24 Compare
Kemp Steve 2023 Birmingham 01:54:24 Compare
Bennett Lloyd 2022 London 01:54:24 Compare
Ng Yixian 2023 Singapore 01:54:24 Compare
Balducci Gabriele 2024 Milan 01:54:24 Compare
Matsnev Justin 2024 Ciudad de Mexico 01:54:24 Compare
Adams Corey 2021 Chicago 01:54:25 Compare
Lau Morgan 2023 Hong Kong 01:54:25 Compare
Mitchell Adrian 2023 Sydney 01:54:25 Compare

Measure Your Performance Against Top Athletes

Other Results from this athlete
No other results found for this athlete.

Ready to conquer your next race?

Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.

Pace Calculator

Share Your Result on Instagram

We've generated the perfect instagram story for you. Don't forget to tag us @roxcoach and redirect to your result page.

Download

Embrace Your Post-Race Recovery Journey

Discover the art of recovery with our expert tips. Tailored for Hyrox athletes, our guide ensures you rejuvenate effectively and return stronger for your next challenge.

Start My Recovery Plan