Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ross Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ross Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ross Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ross Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:28 | 07:54 to 05:26 | 93.7% |
| Run Total | 00:09 | 45:00 to 44:51 | 5.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 03:04 to 03:03 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:33 to 05:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:23 to 06:23 | 0.0% |
| Ross Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 04:51 -01:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 03:42 | 04:33 -00:02 | 04:51 -01:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:41 | 08:13 | 05:19 +00:22 | 09:24 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 13:54 | 03:09 -00:05 | 14:43 -00:49 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 16:58 | 05:47 -00:02 | 17:52 -00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 04:44 | 22:43 | 05:26 -00:42 | 23:39 -00:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 27:27 | 05:47 -00:02 | 29:05 -01:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:33 | 33:12 | 06:01 -00:28 | 34:52 -01:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 38:45 | 05:59 -00:04 | 40:53 -02:08 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 44:40 | 04:58 -00:09 | 46:52 -02:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 49:29 | 05:49 +00:01 | 51:50 -02:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 55:19 | 02:21 -00:08 | 57:39 -02:20 |
| Running 7 | 06:23 | 57:32 | 05:48 +00:35 | 01:00:00 -02:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:54 | 01:03:55 | 05:39 +02:15 | 01:05:48 -01:53 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:11:49 | 06:35 -00:32 | 01:11:27 +00:22 |
| Wall Balls | 06:23 | 01:17:52 | 07:19 -00:56 | 01:18:02 -00:10 |
| Roxzone | 08:59 | 01:33:07 | 07:46 +01:13 | 01:33:07 |
Jack Ross delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 47% overall and 46% within his age group. His total running time was notably strong, being 1:18 faster than the average, indicating a solid running foundation. The initial running segments show that Jack started briskly, with Running 1 being significantly faster than average. This suggests a strong start, but it's important to maintain consistent pacing throughout the race. The later running segments, particularly Running 7, were slower than average, which might indicate fatigue. Overall, Jack has a runner's profile, excelling in running segments, suggesting that focusing more on strength training could balance his performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Medhurst John | 2022 London | 01:33:08 | |
| Pauli Thomas | 2023 München | 01:32:39 | |
| Chua Wei Lien Richardo | 2024 Incheon | 01:32:43 | |
| Breznikar Lars | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:33:34 | |
| Hantl Stefan | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:33:03 | |
| Nute Keith | 2023 London | 01:32:47 | |
| Bon Mathieu | 2024 Marseille | 01:33:12 | |
| Renard Alexandre | 2024 Paris | 01:33:11 | |
| Vogel David | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:32:43 | |
| Cooper Owen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
