Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Oberhausen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 475 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:12 (From 58:47 to 53:35) | 62.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:30 (From 08:20 to 06:50) | 17.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:05 (From 10:35 to 09:30) | 12.9% |
| Rowing | 00:32 (From 05:57 to 05:25) | 6.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 (From 03:00 to 02:56) | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:55 to 04:55) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 03:10 to 03:10) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 07:21 to 07:21) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 07:11 to 07:11) | 0.0% |
| Daemen Uwe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:01 | 00:00 | 05:37 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:55 | 06:01 | 04:53 +00:02 | 05:37 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 06:54 | 10:56 | 06:14 +00:40 | 10:30 +00:26 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 17:50 | 04:03 -00:53 | 16:44 +01:06 |
| Running 3 | 08:00 | 21:00 | 06:57 +01:03 | 20:47 +00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 08:20 | 29:00 | 06:57 +01:23 | 27:44 +01:16 |
| Running 4 | 07:09 | 37:20 | 06:58 +00:11 | 34:41 +02:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:21 | 44:29 | 08:07 -00:46 | 41:39 +02:50 |
| Running 5 | 07:31 | 51:50 | 07:21 +00:10 | 49:46 +02:04 |
| Rowing | 05:57 | 59:21 | 05:28 +00:29 | 57:07 +02:14 |
| Running 6 | 07:41 | 01:05:18 | 07:08 +00:33 | 01:02:35 +02:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:00 | 01:12:59 | 02:51 +00:09 | 01:09:43 +03:16 |
| Running 7 | 07:15 | 01:15:59 | 07:04 +00:11 | 01:12:34 +03:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:11 | 01:23:14 | 07:29 -00:18 | 01:19:38 +03:36 |
| Running 8 | 08:19 | 01:30:25 | 08:59 -00:40 | 01:27:07 +03:18 |
| Wall Balls | 10:35 | 01:38:44 | 09:42 +00:53 | 01:36:06 +02:38 |
| Roxzone | 07:15 | 01:56:27 | 10:39 -03:24 | 01:56:27 |
Pacing: Uwe's pacing was generally consistent throughout the race, with some segments being slightly slower than average. It is important for him to maintain a steady pace to conserve energy and avoid burning out too early in the race.
Profile: Uwe appears to have a hybrid profile, with a good balance between running and strength. However, his total running time of 00:58:47 was 05:53 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from focusing more on improving his running performance.
Overall, Uwe Daemen has shown great determination and potential in the 2019 Oberhausen HYROX race. By focusing on improving his running performance, strengthening his upper and lower body, and refining his technique in specific segments, he can enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chng Eugene | 2024 Singapore | 01:56:57 | |
| Hofmann Silvio | 2022 Berlin | 01:56:08 | |
| Gutiérrez Fonseca Carlos Omar | 2024 Mexico City | 01:56:41 | |
| Griffiths Kevin | 2024 Melbourne | 01:56:32 | |
| Croswell Paul | 2024 Toronto | 01:56:30 | |
| Cavallaro Ren | 2022 London | 01:56:52 | |
| Berlin Ambrose | 2024 Melbourne | 01:56:51 | |
| Meyer Marco | 2022 Bremen | 01:56:06 | |
| Levinta Vasili | 2023 Paris | 01:56:07 | |
| Kirbas Suvat | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:56:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Daemen Uwe
