Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 823 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Crabbe Amanda's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Crabbe Amanda's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Crabbe Amanda's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Crabbe Amanda's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 11:34 | 01:01:51 to 50:17 | 97.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 06:37 to 06:24 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 05:21 to 05:19 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:05 to 07:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:47 to 03:47 | 0.0% |
| Crabbe Amanda | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:01 | 00:00 | 05:37 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:21 | 06:01 | 05:21 +00:00 | 05:37 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 06:14 | 11:22 | 06:04 +00:10 | 10:58 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 17:36 | 03:04 -00:20 | 17:02 +00:34 |
| Running 3 | 06:35 | 20:20 | 06:24 +00:11 | 20:06 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 06:37 | 26:55 | 06:34 +00:03 | 26:30 +00:25 |
| Running 4 | 06:42 | 33:32 | 06:26 +00:16 | 33:04 +00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:05 | 40:14 | 07:23 -00:18 | 39:30 +00:44 |
| Running 5 | 08:47 | 47:19 | 06:39 +02:08 | 46:53 +00:26 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 56:06 | 05:40 -00:33 | 53:32 +02:34 |
| Running 6 | 06:51 | 01:01:13 | 06:30 +00:21 | 59:12 +02:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 01:08:04 | 02:29 -00:04 | 01:05:42 +02:22 |
| Running 7 | 07:15 | 01:10:29 | 06:28 +00:47 | 01:08:11 +02:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:58 | 01:17:44 | 05:37 -00:39 | 01:14:39 +03:05 |
| Running 8 | 08:28 | 01:22:42 | 07:09 +01:19 | 01:20:16 +02:26 |
| Wall Balls | 03:47 | 01:31:10 | 06:01 -02:14 | 01:27:25 +03:45 |
| Roxzone | 06:51 | 01:41:42 | 08:16 -01:25 | 01:41:42 |
However, there are areas of improvement that we can identify to help Amanda enhance her performance even further. Analyzing her splits, we can see that her total running time of 01:01:51 is 12:49 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that Amanda could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transitioning between exercise zones more efficiently. Additionally, her best running lap of 00:06:01 indicates that she has the potential to excel in running.
Amanda should also strategize her transitions between exercise zones to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Practicing efficient and quick transitions during her training can help her save valuable time during the race.
Additionally, Amanda should prioritize maintaining proper form and technique during each exercise. This will not only improve her performance but also reduce the risk of injury.
Overall, Amanda Crabbe has shown great potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving her running performance, enhancing her overall fitness, and implementing effective race strategies, she can continue to excel in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Branch Poppy | 2022 London | 01:41:59 | |
| Zahn Johanna | 2024 Stockholm | 01:41:26 | |
| Harris Nikki | 2024 Brisbane | 01:41:43 | |
| Gracey Ellenor | 2024 Stockholm | 01:41:42 | |
| Gooch Alison | 2024 Birmingham | 01:42:11 | |
| Thies Tabea | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:41:56 | |
| Parry Josie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:41:49 | |
| Zarate Christina | 2024 Dallas | 01:41:52 | |
| Stansfield Bethany | 2024 London | 01:41:32 | |
| Lenes Sam | 2024 Paris | 01:41:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
