Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 887 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Feenstra Anne Sophie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Feenstra Anne Sophie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Feenstra Anne Sophie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Feenstra Anne Sophie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:04 | 43:35 to 39:31 | 69.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:04 | 05:30 to 04:26 | 18.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 02:34 to 02:03 | 8.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 01:59 to 01:50 | 2.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 03:46 to 03:43 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:20 to 03:20 | 0.0% |
| Feenstra Anne Sophie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:52 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 04:52 | 04:52 -00:21 | 04:36 +00:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:11 | 09:23 | 04:53 +00:18 | 09:28 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:34 | 14:34 | 02:25 +00:09 | 14:21 +00:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:18 | 17:08 | 05:08 +00:10 | 16:46 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 03:19 | 22:26 | 04:55 -01:36 | 21:54 +00:32 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 25:45 | 05:09 +00:15 | 26:49 -01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 31:09 | 04:58 +00:32 | 31:58 -00:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:46 | 36:39 | 05:14 +00:32 | 36:56 -00:17 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 42:25 | 05:05 -00:15 | 42:10 +00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 47:15 | 05:12 +00:27 | 47:15 +00:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 52:54 | 02:00 -00:01 | 52:27 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 54:53 | 05:09 +00:22 | 54:27 +00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:46 | 01:00:24 | 04:03 -00:17 | 59:36 +00:48 |
| Running 8 | 05:58 | 01:04:10 | 05:26 +00:32 | 01:03:39 +00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 03:20 | 01:10:08 | 04:03 -00:43 | 01:09:05 +01:03 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:18:43 | 05:35 -00:11 | 01:18:43 |
In terms of specific splits, Anne Sophie's best running lap was 00:04:52. However, there were certain segments where she lost significant time compared to the average, namely the Run Total, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Best Lap, Running 6, Running 1, Running 8, Running 2, Running 7, Running 4, and Running 3.
It is important to note that Anne Sophie's total running time was slower than average, indicating that she may need to focus more on improving her running performance. Additionally, her Roxzone time was slightly faster than average, suggesting that she could work on improving her overall fitness and transition time.
In conclusion, Anne Sophie Feenstra performed exceptionally well in the 2022 Maastricht Hyrox race. While she demonstrated strengths in certain segments, there are areas that can be improved to enhance her overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and efficient transitions, she can further elevate her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Waldt Michaela | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:07 | |
| Ball Melissa | 2024 London | 01:18:32 | |
| Beltramo Marcela | 2023 Barcelona | 01:19:11 | |
| Finnegan Chloe | 2024 Dublin | 01:18:14 | |
| Vanier Sarah | 2024 Houston | 01:19:13 | |
| Kahn Anna | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:32 | |
| Gauthier Manon | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:18:24 | |
| Ingrahm Katelyn | 2023 Dallas | 01:19:04 | |
| Fackler Romina | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:22 | |
| Young Rebecca | 2023 London | 01:18:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Essen | 01:12:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
