Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 969 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Den Hertog Gijs's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Den Hertog Gijs's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Den Hertog Gijs's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Den Hertog Gijs's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:04 | 11:26 to 08:22 | 69.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 07:06 to 06:24 | 15.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 03:08 to 02:39 | 10.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:55 to 04:45 | 3.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:32 to 03:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 49:45 to 49:45 | 0.0% |
| Den Hertog Gijs | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:57 | 00:00 | 05:17 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:55 | 05:57 | 04:43 +00:12 | 05:17 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 10:52 | 05:46 -00:10 | 10:00 +00:52 |
| Sled Push | 03:32 | 16:28 | 03:39 -00:07 | 15:46 +00:42 |
| Running 3 | 06:07 | 20:00 | 06:26 -00:19 | 19:25 +00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 26:07 | 06:16 -01:23 | 25:51 +00:16 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 31:00 | 06:24 -00:19 | 32:07 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:27 | 37:05 | 07:05 -01:38 | 38:31 -01:26 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 42:32 | 06:40 -00:37 | 45:36 -03:04 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 48:35 | 05:14 -00:10 | 52:16 -03:41 |
| Running 6 | 05:55 | 53:39 | 06:29 -00:34 | 57:30 -03:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:08 | 59:34 | 02:37 +00:31 | 01:03:59 -04:25 |
| Running 7 | 06:23 | 01:02:42 | 06:28 -00:05 | 01:06:36 -03:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:06 | 01:09:05 | 06:38 +00:28 | 01:13:04 -03:59 |
| Running 8 | 07:42 | 01:16:11 | 07:44 -00:02 | 01:19:42 -03:31 |
| Wall Balls | 11:26 | 01:23:53 | 08:41 +02:45 | 01:27:26 -03:33 |
| Roxzone | 10:12 | 01:45:22 | 09:15 +00:57 | 01:45:22 |
Pacing: Gijs seemed to have a relatively consistent pace throughout the race, with some segments being faster or slower than the average. However, his overall running time was 20 seconds slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus more on his running endurance.
Profile: Based on the total running time, Gijs has more of a runner profile and could benefit from training his strength to improve overall performance.
Overall, Gijs Den Hertog has shown potential in the HYROX race. By focusing on improving specific segments and implementing effective race strategies, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moerland Erik | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:45:48 | |
| Ward Kevin | 2024 Dublin | 01:45:51 | |
| Rhynes Glen | 2024 London | 01:45:05 | |
| Eaton Carl | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:58 | |
| Hakvoort Marcel | 2022 Essen | 01:45:43 | |
| Fabry Hans | 2022 Essen | 01:45:25 | |
| Smith Steve | 2024 Manchester | 01:45:18 | |
| Eijkemans Koen | 2024 Maastricht | 01:45:13 | |
| Murphy Colin | 2024 Dublin | 01:45:00 | |
| MermoudGasser Franck | 2024 Paris | 01:45:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
