Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcdonald Conor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcdonald Conor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcdonald Conor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcdonald Conor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:38 | 07:31 to 05:53 | 47.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:03 | 05:45 to 04:42 | 30.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:32 | 05:22 to 04:50 | 15.5% |
| Run Total | 00:12 | 41:11 to 40:59 | 5.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:23 to 04:21 | 1.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Mcdonald Conor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:31 | 04:25 -00:02 | 04:33 +00:58 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 09:54 | 04:53 -00:17 | 08:58 +00:56 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 14:30 | 02:52 -00:16 | 13:51 +00:39 |
| Running 3 | 04:53 | 17:06 | 05:19 -00:26 | 16:43 +00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 21:59 | 04:50 -00:36 | 22:02 -00:03 |
| Running 4 | 04:57 | 26:13 | 05:17 -00:20 | 26:52 -00:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:22 | 31:10 | 05:10 +00:12 | 32:09 -00:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 36:32 | 05:27 +00:05 | 37:19 -00:47 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 42:04 | 04:47 -00:09 | 42:46 -00:42 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 46:42 | 05:18 -00:20 | 47:33 -00:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 51:40 | 02:09 -00:33 | 52:51 -01:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 53:16 | 05:18 -00:10 | 55:00 -01:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:45 | 58:24 | 04:59 +00:46 | 01:00:18 -01:54 |
| Running 8 | 05:39 | 01:04:09 | 05:52 -00:13 | 01:05:17 -01:08 |
| Wall Balls | 07:31 | 01:09:48 | 06:17 +01:14 | 01:11:09 -01:21 |
| Roxzone | 06:50 | 01:24:02 | 06:36 +00:14 | 01:24:02 |
Conor McDonald has shown commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox event. He ranked in the top 30% of overall athletes and was within the top 36% in his age group (35-39). His total running time was faster than average, suggesting that he has a stronger runner profile. Despite starting slower in the first run, Conor managed to pick up pace remarkably in the subsequent running segments. His strength shines through in the 'Farmers Carry' segment where he ranks in the top 4 percentile. However, his slower than average Roxzone time indicates a possible need for improved fitness and transition time.
Conor would benefit from considering the following strategies during his races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitterndorfer Manuel | 2022 Wien | 01:24:24 | |
| Belfqih Jawad | 2023 Köln | 01:24:00 | |
| Ellis Kristian | 2022 Birmingham | 01:23:46 | |
| Canella Gabriele | 2024 Milan | 01:23:48 | |
| Kaliszewski Karol | 2023 Warschau | 01:23:43 | |
| Walter Kay | 2023 München | 01:24:21 | |
| Kamella Jannik Benjamin | 2023 München | 01:24:19 | |
| Moreau Florent | 2024 Paris | 01:23:47 | |
| Klaassen Ben | 2024 Brisbane | 01:23:34 | |
| Berney Jake | 2023 Manchester | 01:23:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:31:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
