Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
Compare With Another Athlete
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:48 (From 05:55 to 05:07) | 36.1% |
| Run Total | 00:48 (From 44:32 to 43:44) | 36.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 (From 05:11 to 04:57) | 10.5% |
| BBJ | 00:09 (From 05:36 to 05:27) | 6.8% |
| Rowing | 00:08 (From 05:20 to 05:12) | 6.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 (From 02:09 to 02:03) | 4.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:06 to 02:06) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:12 to 04:12) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:02 to 04:02) | 0.0% |
| Philipp Janna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:34 | 00:00 | 05:02 -00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:11 | 04:34 | 05:03 +00:08 | 05:02 -00:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 09:45 | 05:19 +00:01 | 10:05 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 15:05 | 02:39 -00:33 | 15:24 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 17:11 | 05:36 +00:03 | 18:03 -00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 22:50 | 05:34 +00:21 | 23:39 -00:49 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 28:45 | 05:38 -00:12 | 29:13 -00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:36 | 34:11 | 05:48 -00:12 | 34:51 -00:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:43 | 39:47 | 05:46 -00:03 | 40:39 -00:52 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 45:30 | 05:18 +00:02 | 46:25 -00:55 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 50:50 | 05:40 -00:07 | 51:43 -00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 56:23 | 02:11 -00:02 | 57:23 -01:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 58:32 | 05:39 -00:02 | 59:34 -01:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 01:04:09 | 04:36 -00:24 | 01:05:13 -01:04 |
| Running 8 | 06:45 | 01:08:21 | 06:04 +00:41 | 01:09:49 -01:28 |
| Wall Balls | 04:02 | 01:15:06 | 04:47 -00:45 | 01:15:53 -00:47 |
| Roxzone | 08:16 | 01:27:16 | 06:36 +01:40 | 01:27:16 |
It is worth noting that Janna Philipp excelled in the Running 1 segment, completing it in 00:04:34, which was 00:18 faster than the average time. This highlights her strength in running and suggests that she has a runner profile. However, she struggled in the Ski Erg segment, completing it in 00:05:11, which was 00:11 slower than the average time. This indicates a need for improvement in her skiing technique and overall fitness.
Overall, Janna Philipp has shown strong potential in the Hyrox race, with her strengths lying in running and areas for improvement in transitions and skiing. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, focusing on improving overall fitness, and practicing efficient transitions, Janna can enhance her performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bayliss Lucinda | 2024 London | 01:27:05 | |
| Brenner Sarah | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:27:20 | |
| Rosant Gaelle | 2024 Paris | 01:27:10 | |
| Cuthbertson Lisa | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:47 | |
| Colwill Kylie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:20 | |
| Perrino Elodie | 2024 Marseille | 01:27:15 | |
| Nedelko Haley | 2024 Toronto | 01:27:25 | |
| Cooper Lucy | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:02 | |
| Adamiak Virginia | 2022 Hamburg | 01:27:37 | |
| Tamez Arlette | 2024 Mexico City | 01:26:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Karlsruhe Philipp Janna | 01:32:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Philipp Janna
