Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 234 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jovic Ljubodrag's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jovic Ljubodrag's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jovic Ljubodrag's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jovic Ljubodrag's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:35 | 01:03:58 to 56:23 | 72.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:34 | 10:20 to 07:46 | 24.6% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 05:52 to 05:34 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:58 to 06:58 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:13 to 08:13 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 10:13 to 10:13 | 0.0% |
| Jovic Ljubodrag | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:55 | 00:00 | 06:02 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 05:55 | 04:58 -00:11 | 06:02 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 06:34 | 10:42 | 06:29 +00:05 | 11:00 -00:18 |
| Sled Push | 01:46 | 17:16 | 03:56 -02:10 | 17:29 -00:13 |
| Running 3 | 08:38 | 19:02 | 07:23 +01:15 | 21:25 -02:23 |
| Sled Pull | 06:58 | 27:40 | 07:20 -00:22 | 28:48 -01:08 |
| Running 4 | 08:09 | 34:38 | 07:31 +00:38 | 36:08 -01:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:13 | 42:47 | 09:03 -00:50 | 43:39 -00:52 |
| Running 5 | 08:39 | 51:00 | 07:57 +00:42 | 52:42 -01:42 |
| Rowing | 05:52 | 59:39 | 05:38 +00:14 | 01:00:39 -01:00 |
| Running 6 | 07:36 | 01:05:31 | 07:40 -00:04 | 01:06:17 -00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 01:13:07 | 03:05 -00:59 | 01:13:57 -00:50 |
| Running 7 | 08:22 | 01:15:13 | 07:41 +00:41 | 01:17:02 -01:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 10:20 | 01:23:35 | 08:38 +01:42 | 01:24:43 -01:08 |
| Running 8 | 10:08 | 01:33:55 | 09:54 +00:14 | 01:33:21 +00:34 |
| Wall Balls | 10:13 | 01:44:03 | 11:31 -01:18 | 01:43:15 +00:48 |
| Roxzone | 12:13 | 02:06:22 | 11:36 +00:37 | 02:06:22 |
Based on the splits analysis, Jovic's total running time of 01:03:58 was 06:56 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time to improve his performance in the roxzone. Additionally, his total running time was slower than average, suggesting that he should focus on training his running abilities.
Overall, Jovic has a solid foundation in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on his running performance, improving his transition time, and implementing effective race strategies, he can enhance his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conetta Paul | 2024 Glasgow | 02:06:17 | |
| Otten Denni | 2022 Amsterdam | 02:06:29 | |
| Massar Philipp | 2018 Stuttgart | 02:06:03 | |
| Irving David | 2024 London | 02:06:46 | |
| Deroche Benjamin | 2024 Bordeaux | 02:06:30 | |
| Loy Melvin | 2023 Singapore | 02:06:21 | |
| Jones Rick | 2023 London | 02:05:52 | |
| Oke Anthony | 2024 Paris | 02:06:38 | |
| Oplawski Louis | 2020 Chicago | 02:06:16 | |
| Witte Dyon | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 02:06:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
