Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Roberts Callum's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Roberts Callum's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Roberts Callum's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Roberts Callum's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ski Erg | 00:28 | 04:46 to 04:18 | 45.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:13 | 02:45 to 02:32 | 21.3% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:49 to 04:38 | 18.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:02 to 01:56 | 9.8% |
| Run Total | 00:03 | 40:01 to 39:58 | 4.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Roberts Callum | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:36 | 00:00 | 04:30 +01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 05:36 | 04:23 +00:23 | 04:30 +01:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 10:22 | 04:48 -00:13 | 08:53 +01:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 14:57 | 02:47 -00:02 | 13:41 +01:16 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 17:42 | 05:12 -00:22 | 16:28 +01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:20 | 22:32 | 04:41 -00:21 | 21:40 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 26:52 | 05:09 -00:04 | 26:21 +00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:21 | 31:57 | 04:59 -00:38 | 31:30 +00:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 36:18 | 05:19 +00:05 | 36:29 -00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 41:42 | 04:44 +00:05 | 41:48 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:42 | 46:31 | 05:12 -00:30 | 46:32 -00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 51:13 | 02:07 -00:05 | 51:44 -00:31 |
| Running 7 | 04:31 | 53:15 | 05:10 -00:39 | 53:51 -00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:43 | 57:46 | 04:51 -02:08 | 59:01 -01:15 |
| Running 8 | 05:21 | 01:00:29 | 05:42 -00:21 | 01:03:52 -03:23 |
| Wall Balls | 05:34 | 01:05:50 | 06:09 -00:35 | 01:09:34 -03:44 |
| Roxzone | 10:47 | 01:22:03 | 06:20 +04:27 | 01:22:03 |
Callum Roberts displayed a highly commendable performance, ranking in the top 27% of all athletes and top 32% in his age group. His total running time was 01:16 faster than average, indicating he is strong in running. However, the slower Roxzone time indicates that his transition time or recovery between exercises needs improvement. His pacing in the early stages of the races seemed slower, but he picked up speed as the race progressed. Overall, he seems to have a more runner profile and may need to train more on the strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Morris Gavin | 2023 Manchester | 01:21:44 | |
| O'Meara Sam | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:42 | |
| Durham Bryce | 2024 Brisbane | 01:21:54 | |
| Costa Paulo | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:19 | |
| Fine Derek | 2024 Anaheim | 01:22:19 | |
| Bailey Joseph | 2022 London | 01:22:16 | |
| Qian James | 2023 Melbourne | 01:22:10 | |
| Mcdermott Ian | 2023 Dubai | 01:22:03 | |
| Muñoz Gomez Ivan | 2023 Malaga | 01:22:22 | |
| Matthews Robert | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
