Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 696 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcgrath Treasa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcgrath Treasa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcgrath Treasa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcgrath Treasa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:39 | 55:11 to 51:32 | 51.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:40 | 09:09 to 07:29 | 23.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:31 | 07:35 to 06:04 | 21.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 05:55 to 05:40 | 3.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:55 to 02:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Mcgrath Treasa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 05:42 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:58 | 04:27 | 05:23 -00:25 | 05:42 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 06:37 | 09:25 | 06:12 +00:25 | 11:05 -01:40 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 16:02 | 03:07 -00:12 | 17:17 -01:15 |
| Running 3 | 06:52 | 18:57 | 06:35 +00:17 | 20:24 -01:27 |
| Sled Pull | 05:00 | 25:49 | 06:42 -01:42 | 26:59 -01:10 |
| Running 4 | 07:14 | 30:49 | 06:38 +00:36 | 33:41 -02:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:09 | 38:03 | 07:43 +01:26 | 40:19 -02:16 |
| Running 5 | 07:30 | 47:12 | 06:52 +00:38 | 48:02 -00:50 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 54:42 | 05:43 -00:19 | 54:54 -00:12 |
| Running 6 | 07:20 | 01:00:06 | 06:46 +00:34 | 01:00:37 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 01:07:26 | 02:33 -00:28 | 01:07:23 +00:03 |
| Running 7 | 07:09 | 01:09:31 | 06:43 +00:26 | 01:09:56 -00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 01:16:40 | 05:51 +00:04 | 01:16:39 +00:01 |
| Running 8 | 08:06 | 01:22:35 | 07:28 +00:38 | 01:22:30 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 07:35 | 01:30:41 | 06:13 +01:22 | 01:29:58 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:43 | 01:44:51 | 08:40 -01:57 | 01:44:51 |
Treasa Mcgrath delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 25% overall and in her age group. With an overall time of 1:44:51, she demonstrated a commendable balance between endurance and strength. However, her total running time was 00:55:11, which was 01:27 slower than the average, suggesting that her running could be optimized. The initial running segments (Running 1) show that Treasa started the race with a strong pace, indicating a potential inclination to start fast. Her performance across the event suggests a balanced profile, with areas of strength in both running and strength exercises, but with room for enhancement in specific segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nolan Jessica | 2023 Dublin | 01:45:15 | |
| Sykes Emma | 2024 Dublin | 01:44:46 | |
| A Sharp Fiona | 2024 Paris | 01:45:19 | |
| Rehn Elsa | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:44:41 | |
| Ong Sherlyn | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:45:13 | |
| Lau Hera | 2024 Taipei | 01:44:46 | |
| Buchan Jill | 2024 Paris | 01:44:28 | |
| Nutt Carol | 2023 Glasgow | 01:44:36 | |
| Thorby Naomi | 2024 London | 01:44:37 | |
| Cawthorne Helen | 2024 Manchester | 01:45:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:47:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
