Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jones Graham's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jones Graham's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jones Graham's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jones Graham's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:39 | 07:11 to 05:32 | 41.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:20 | 07:59 to 06:39 | 33.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 05:32 to 05:02 | 12.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:40 to 04:29 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:01 to 04:52 | 3.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:09 | 05:24 to 05:15 | 3.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:14 to 02:12 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:04 to 42:04 | 0.0% |
| Jones Graham | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:47 | 00:00 | 04:45 +01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 05:47 | 04:31 +00:09 | 04:45 +01:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 10:27 | 05:10 -00:21 | 09:16 +01:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 15:16 | 03:04 -00:12 | 14:26 +00:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:02 | 18:08 | 05:38 -00:36 | 17:30 +00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 05:32 | 23:10 | 05:17 +00:15 | 23:08 +00:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:08 | 28:42 | 05:37 -00:29 | 28:25 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:11 | 33:50 | 05:49 +01:22 | 34:02 -00:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 41:01 | 05:49 -00:34 | 39:51 +01:10 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 46:16 | 04:55 +00:06 | 45:40 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 51:17 | 05:40 -00:26 | 50:35 +00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 56:31 | 02:18 -00:04 | 56:15 +00:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 58:45 | 05:38 -00:22 | 58:33 +00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:24 | 01:04:01 | 05:30 -00:06 | 01:04:11 -00:10 |
| Running 8 | 05:36 | 01:09:25 | 06:21 -00:45 | 01:09:41 -00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 07:59 | 01:15:01 | 07:01 +00:58 | 01:16:02 -01:01 |
| Roxzone | 07:42 | 01:30:34 | 07:31 +00:11 | 01:30:34 |
Graham Jones, in the age group of 60-64, delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race, ranking in the top 42% of all athletes and the top 18% in his age group. His overall time was 01:30:34. Most notably, his total running time was 00:42:04, which was 02:48 faster than average, signifying a strong running profile. However, there's some room for improvement in the strength-related segments of the race.
His pacing throughout the race seemed consistent, starting slightly slow in Running 1 but quickly picking up pace for the rest of the running segments. However, his performance in the Roxzone, which was slower than average, indicates a need for better transition times and overall fitness improvement.
To improve overall race performance, Graham should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cuatianquiz Josue | 2023 Houston | 01:30:49 | |
| Schuchhardt Manuel | 2023 München | 01:30:53 | |
| Trew Karl | 2024 New York | 01:30:08 | |
| Mulder Glenn | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:30:11 | |
| Böttger Daniel | 2019 Leipzig | 01:30:51 | |
| Alvarado Lopez Armin | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:30:54 | |
| Bloxham Lee | 2023 London | 01:31:04 | |
| Pritchards Tom | 2024 Brisbane | 01:30:24 | |
| Petrov Dmytro | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:30:46 | |
| Krug Fabian | 2024 Berlin | 01:30:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:27:38 | |
| 2024 London | 01:42:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
