Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jessen Anita's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jessen Anita's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jessen Anita's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jessen Anita's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 03:10 to 02:34 | 32.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 06:06 to 05:47 | 17.3% |
| Run Total | 00:19 | 45:29 to 45:10 | 17.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:26 to 02:08 | 16.4% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 05:33 to 05:17 | 14.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 04:37 to 04:35 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Jessen Anita | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 05:09 +00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 05:12 | 05:08 -00:08 | 05:09 +00:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 10:12 | 05:30 -00:07 | 10:17 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 15:35 | 02:44 +00:26 | 15:47 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 18:45 | 05:47 -00:11 | 18:31 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 24:21 | 05:46 -00:44 | 24:18 +00:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 29:23 | 05:49 -00:07 | 30:04 -00:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:06 | 35:05 | 06:08 -00:02 | 35:53 -00:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 41:11 | 05:57 -00:09 | 42:01 -00:50 |
| Rowing | 05:33 | 46:59 | 05:22 +00:11 | 47:58 -00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 52:32 | 05:50 -00:06 | 53:20 -00:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:26 | 58:16 | 02:15 +00:11 | 59:10 -00:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 01:00:42 | 05:49 +00:02 | 01:01:25 -00:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:37 | 01:06:33 | 04:47 -00:10 | 01:07:14 -00:41 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:11:10 | 06:14 +00:02 | 01:12:01 -00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 03:43 | 01:17:26 | 04:53 -01:10 | 01:18:15 -00:49 |
| Roxzone | 08:58 | 01:30:00 | 06:52 +02:06 | 01:30:00 |
Anita's best running lap was 00:05:12, which indicates her potential as a strong runner. However, there are areas where she could improve to enhance her overall performance.
Overall, Anita should focus on improving her overall fitness, reducing transition times, and specific training strategies targeting her weaker segments. By incorporating these recommendations into her training routine, Anita can enhance her performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bosma Sanne | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:31 | |
| Reid Julie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:35 | |
| Brookes Karen | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:50 | |
| 孟 飞 | 2024 Beijing | 01:30:20 | |
| Van Der Steen Jara | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:41 | |
| Short Tamla | 2023 Dublin | 01:30:20 | |
| Garcia Lahud Luisa | 2024 Mexico City | 01:29:57 | |
| Gabb Lisa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:30 | |
| Rohe Vivian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:22 | |
| Bekker Annelize | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Malmö | 01:40:55 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:38:10 | |
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:30:20 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:38:00 | |
| 2023 Frankfurt | 01:31:52 | |
| 2021 Berlin | 01:43:35 | |
| 2024 Stockholm | 01:30:37 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:58 | |
| 2024 Berlin | 01:31:08 | |
| 2022 Bremen | 01:35:52 | |
| 2022 Berlin | 01:50:00 | |
| 2019 Hannover | 01:39:57 | |
| 2023 München | 01:32:23 | |
| 2020 Hannover | 01:35:09 | |
| 2021 Hamburg | 01:37:14 | |
| 2023 Hannover | 01:29:35 | |
| 2018 Hamburg | 01:36:08 | |
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:30:48 | |
| 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:26:31 | |
| 2019 Hamburg | 01:41:23 | |
| 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:31:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
