Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nichols Greg's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nichols Greg's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nichols Greg's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nichols Greg's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:33 | 07:42 to 05:09 | 55.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 04:57 to 04:09 | 17.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:35 | 04:45 to 04:10 | 12.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:14 | 04:14 to 04:00 | 5.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:00 to 01:48 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:21 to 04:12 | 3.3% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:36 to 04:31 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:01 to 37:01 | 0.0% |
| Nichols Greg | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:57 | 00:00 | 04:18 -01:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 02:57 | 04:19 +00:02 | 04:18 -01:21 |
| Running 2 | 04:18 | 07:18 | 04:35 -00:17 | 08:37 -01:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 11:36 | 02:38 -00:22 | 13:12 -01:36 |
| Running 3 | 04:57 | 13:52 | 04:58 -00:01 | 15:50 -01:58 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 18:49 | 04:23 -00:09 | 20:48 -01:59 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 23:03 | 04:57 -00:02 | 25:11 -02:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:57 | 27:58 | 04:36 +00:21 | 30:08 -02:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:00 | 32:55 | 05:04 -00:04 | 34:44 -01:49 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 37:55 | 04:37 -00:01 | 39:48 -01:53 |
| Running 6 | 04:53 | 42:31 | 04:58 -00:05 | 44:25 -01:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 47:24 | 01:59 +00:01 | 49:23 -01:59 |
| Running 7 | 04:42 | 49:24 | 04:57 -00:15 | 51:22 -01:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 54:06 | 04:31 +00:14 | 56:19 -02:13 |
| Running 8 | 05:23 | 58:51 | 05:24 -00:01 | 01:00:50 -01:59 |
| Wall Balls | 07:42 | 01:04:14 | 05:42 +02:00 | 01:06:14 -02:00 |
| Roxzone | 06:02 | 01:17:49 | 05:53 +00:09 | 01:17:49 |
Greg Nichols put up a strong performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX event. His overall rank of 475 and rank in age group of 69 are commendable, placing him in the top 40% of athletes in both categories. Notably, his total running time was 02:22 faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. This suggests Greg is adept at maintaining a fast pace throughout the race, with his best running lap at 00:04:18. However, his roxzone time was slower than average, which could signal a need for increased fitness and quicker transitions.
Based on his performance, some strategies that Greg may employ for improved race performance include:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parish Charlie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:26 | |
| Farrelly Joseph | 2024 Dublin | 01:18:10 | |
| MorrisWilliams Ashley | 2024 Dallas | 01:17:44 | |
| evans stephen | 2024 New York | 01:18:08 | |
| Hall Chris | 2022 London | 01:17:36 | |
| Witt Alexander | 2019 Hannover | 01:17:49 | |
| Scalora Ben | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:38 | |
| Dehlinger Florian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:17:27 | |
| Rudolf Pascal | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:18:08 | |
| Hollmann Mario | 2022 München | 01:17:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
