Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 610 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Copeland Nina's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Copeland Nina's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Copeland Nina's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Copeland Nina's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:24 | 58:27 to 52:03 | 76.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:59 | 08:11 to 06:12 | 23.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 03:12 to 03:11 | 0.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:11 to 07:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Copeland Nina | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:47 | 00:00 | 05:42 -00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:22 | 04:47 | 05:25 -00:03 | 05:42 -00:55 |
| Running 2 | 06:44 | 10:09 | 06:15 +00:29 | 11:07 -00:58 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 16:53 | 03:09 +00:03 | 17:22 -00:29 |
| Running 3 | 07:22 | 20:05 | 06:38 +00:44 | 20:31 -00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:35 | 27:27 | 06:53 -01:18 | 27:09 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 07:35 | 33:02 | 06:42 +00:53 | 34:02 -01:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:11 | 40:37 | 08:01 -00:50 | 40:44 -00:07 |
| Running 5 | 08:34 | 47:48 | 06:54 +01:40 | 48:45 -00:57 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 56:22 | 05:47 -00:35 | 55:39 +00:43 |
| Running 6 | 07:41 | 01:01:34 | 06:47 +00:54 | 01:01:26 +00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 01:09:15 | 02:35 -00:34 | 01:08:13 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 07:28 | 01:11:16 | 06:46 +00:42 | 01:10:48 +00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:42 | 01:18:44 | 05:57 -01:15 | 01:17:34 +01:10 |
| Running 8 | 08:20 | 01:23:26 | 07:33 +00:47 | 01:23:31 -00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 08:11 | 01:31:46 | 06:27 +01:44 | 01:31:04 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:46:13 | 08:42 -02:18 | 01:46:13 |
Nina Copeland showcased an exceptional performance at the 2024 Manchester HYROX Race. Her overall rank of 238 places her in the top 15% of all athletes, and she ranks in the top 27% of her age group of 16-24. This is an impressive result, especially considering the highly competitive nature of the event.
Her total running time was slower than average, suggesting a stronger aptitude for strength exercises than running. This is further supported by her faster-than-average times in strength-focused exercises, such as the sled pull, burpees broad jump, rowing, farmers carry, and sandbag lunges.
Additionally, her roxzone time was significantly faster than average, indicating efficient transition times and satisfactory overall fitness. However, the pacing throughout the race suggests that she started too fast, as her first running segment was significantly faster than average but slowed down in subsequent running segments.
Considering Nina's performance, the following strategies could be implemented:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sauer Alida | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:46:17 | |
| Twitchell Suzanne | 2023 London | 01:45:43 | |
| Purwaha Supriya | 2023 Barcelona | 01:46:23 | |
| Taylor Sarah | 2023 London | 01:46:06 | |
| Birosz Nicole | 2024 New York | 01:46:18 | |
| Carolan Melissa | 2024 Malaga | 01:46:01 | |
| Monsalve Claudia | 2019 Miami | 01:46:22 | |
| Bijkerk Milaine | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:46:06 | |
| Westergaard Maria Schøsler | 2024 Stockholm | 01:46:32 | |
| Vermeulen Annecke | 2024 Cape Town | 01:45:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
