Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wright Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wright Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wright Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wright Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:17 | 48:45 to 44:28 | 77.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:44 | 06:24 to 05:40 | 13.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:31 | 02:45 to 02:14 | 9.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Wright Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:25 | 00:00 | 04:49 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 05:25 | 04:33 -00:17 | 04:49 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 09:41 | 05:19 +00:12 | 09:22 +00:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 15:12 | 03:08 -00:19 | 14:41 +00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:42 | 18:01 | 05:47 -00:05 | 17:49 +00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 04:55 | 23:43 | 05:23 -00:28 | 23:36 +00:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 28:38 | 05:46 -00:08 | 28:59 -00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:24 | 34:16 | 06:00 +00:24 | 34:45 -00:29 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 40:40 | 05:58 -00:10 | 40:45 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 46:28 | 04:58 -00:12 | 46:43 -00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 51:14 | 05:48 -00:01 | 51:41 -00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:45 | 57:01 | 02:21 +00:24 | 57:29 -00:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 59:46 | 05:46 +00:04 | 59:50 -00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:05:36 | 05:36 -00:25 | 01:05:36 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 09:08 | 01:10:47 | 06:33 +02:35 | 01:11:12 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 05:51 | 01:19:55 | 07:14 -01:23 | 01:17:45 +02:10 |
| Roxzone | 07:02 | 01:32:41 | 07:42 -00:40 | 01:32:41 |
Based on the splits analysis, Mark's running performance was slightly slower than average, with a total running time of 00:48:45, which was 04:38 slower than the average. This indicates that he could benefit from focusing on improving his running speed and endurance.
In conclusion, Mark Wright had a solid performance in the 2022 London HYROX race, but there are areas where he can make improvements to enhance his performance in future races. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, working on specific segments that caused him to lose time, and implementing effective race strategies, Mark can continue to improve and achieve better results in his future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Velazquez Carlos | 2022 Madrid | 01:33:07 | |
| Fürst Sven | 2022 Essen | 01:32:32 | |
| Cousin Asher | 2022 Chicago | 01:32:57 | |
| Doyle Jeff | 2024 Dublin | 01:32:56 | |
| Rasoldier Riana | 2024 Marseille | 01:32:50 | |
| Martínez Cantero Custodio | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:28 | |
| Matzky Jens | 2020 Hannover | 01:32:54 | |
| Lee Chris | 2024 Stockholm | 01:32:30 | |
| Williams David | 2023 London | 01:32:20 | |
| Tynan Dean | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:22:13 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:25:15 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
