Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Biegel Jelle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Biegel Jelle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Biegel Jelle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Biegel Jelle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:02 | 45:42 to 42:40 | 65.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:35 | 02:42 to 02:07 | 12.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 05:25 to 05:01 | 8.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 04:49 to 04:26 | 8.2% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:55 to 04:47 | 2.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 04:53 to 04:49 | 1.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 05:17 to 05:14 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Biegel Jelle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:15 | 00:00 | 04:41 -01:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 03:15 | 04:29 +00:20 | 04:41 -01:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 08:04 | 05:05 +00:18 | 09:10 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 13:27 | 02:59 -00:41 | 14:15 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 15:45 | 05:33 +00:12 | 17:14 -01:29 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 21:30 | 05:05 -00:12 | 22:47 -01:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:56 | 26:23 | 05:31 +00:25 | 27:52 -01:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:17 | 32:19 | 05:34 -00:17 | 33:23 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:18 | 37:36 | 05:42 +00:36 | 38:57 -01:21 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 43:54 | 04:52 +00:03 | 44:39 -00:45 |
| Running 6 | 05:57 | 48:49 | 05:33 +00:24 | 49:31 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 54:46 | 02:14 +00:28 | 55:04 -00:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 57:28 | 05:32 +00:29 | 57:18 +00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:03:29 | 05:18 +00:07 | 01:02:50 +00:39 |
| Running 8 | 07:11 | 01:08:54 | 06:11 +01:00 | 01:08:08 +00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 05:12 | 01:16:05 | 06:45 -01:33 | 01:14:19 +01:46 |
| Roxzone | 06:59 | 01:28:08 | 07:04 -00:05 | 01:28:08 |
Jelle Biegel's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race was commendable, with an overall rank of 1220, placing him in the top 39% of all athletes and top 37% within his age group. The race showcased his strengths, particularly in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Wall Balls, where he performed significantly better than average. However, his total running time was slower than the average by 01:33, indicating room for improvement in running. Jelle's pacing was potentially too fast initially, as seen in Running 1, where he was significantly faster than average, but he gradually slowed down in subsequent running segments. His profile suggests a hybrid athlete with a slight edge in strength-based activities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grünke Robin | 2023 Wien | 01:28:13 | |
| Asheshov William | 2023 Malaga | 01:28:29 | |
| Hoveling Nick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:38 | |
| Key Ryan | 2024 Sydney | 01:27:51 | |
| Finley Cj | 2021 Dallas | 01:27:59 | |
| Thomson Adam | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:42 | |
| Tap Kaya | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:51 | |
| Mcintyre Lukas | 2024 Brisbane | 01:28:00 | |
| Sek Konrad | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:37 | |
| Cunningham Thomas | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:28:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
