Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:16 (From 06:59 to 05:43) | 44.2% |
| BBJ | 00:40 (From 05:22 to 04:42) | 23.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:39 (From 05:14 to 04:35) | 22.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 (From 02:05 to 01:57) | 4.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 (From 04:25 to 04:19) | 3.5% |
| Run Total | 00:03 (From 40:20 to 40:17) | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:10 to 02:10) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:14 to 04:14) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:34 to 04:34) | 0.0% |
| Thompson Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 04:30 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:35 | 04:24 +00:01 | 04:30 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 09:00 | 04:51 -00:13 | 08:54 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:10 | 13:38 | 02:50 -00:40 | 13:45 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 15:48 | 05:14 -00:15 | 16:35 -00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 20:47 | 04:45 -00:31 | 21:49 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:57 | 25:01 | 05:12 -00:15 | 26:34 -01:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:22 | 29:58 | 05:02 +00:20 | 31:46 -01:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 35:20 | 05:21 -00:16 | 36:48 -01:28 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 40:25 | 04:45 -00:11 | 42:09 -01:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 44:59 | 05:14 -00:02 | 46:54 -01:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 50:11 | 02:07 -00:02 | 52:08 -01:57 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 52:16 | 05:13 -00:05 | 54:15 -01:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:14 | 57:24 | 04:52 +00:22 | 59:28 -02:04 |
| Running 8 | 05:49 | 01:02:38 | 05:44 +00:05 | 01:04:20 -01:42 |
| Wall Balls | 06:59 | 01:08:27 | 06:14 +00:45 | 01:10:04 -01:37 |
| Roxzone | 07:23 | 01:22:42 | 06:24 +00:59 | 01:22:42 |
Andrew Thompson delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing a rank in the top 24% of all participants and top 28% in his age group. His overall time of 01:22:42 indicates a solid endurance foundation, with a total running time of 00:40:20, which is 01:21 faster than the average. This suggests that Andrew has a strong runner profile, excelling particularly in the running segments. Notably, his best running lap was 00:04:38. In terms of pacing, Andrew's initial running segments were slightly slower than the average, suggesting a conservative start that may have helped preserve energy for later stages. However, his slower performance in strength-based segments like Wall Balls and Burpees Broad Jump indicates an opportunity to enhance his strength conditioning.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mannix Josh | 2023 Manchester | 01:22:29 | |
| Brumfit Ben | 2024 Berlin | 01:23:11 | |
| Ng Brendan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:14 | |
| Zahrte Christopher | 2022 Hamburg | 01:22:52 | |
| Malkin Phil | 2024 Berlin | 01:23:07 | |
| Denz Erik | 2023 Hamburg | 01:22:23 | |
| Zuza Vadim | 2024 Milan | 01:22:24 | |
| Ballesta Martn Alejandro | 2023 Bilbao | 01:22:37 | |
| Manzetti Claudius | 2019 Hamburg | 01:22:36 | |
| Krzemien John | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:22:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne Thompson Andrew | 01:23:39 | |
| 2023 Sydney Thompson Andrew, Fowler Jason | 01:13:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Thompson Andrew
