Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Montgomery James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Montgomery James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Montgomery James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Montgomery James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:14 | 43:53 to 40:39 | 67.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 05:16 to 04:28 | 16.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 04:55 to 04:38 | 5.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:15 | 06:03 to 05:48 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:27 to 04:20 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 02:41 to 02:36 | 1.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Montgomery James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 04:30 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:46 | 04:24 +00:03 | 04:30 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 05:26 | 08:13 | 04:52 +00:34 | 08:54 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 13:39 | 02:52 -00:11 | 13:46 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 16:20 | 05:16 +00:22 | 16:38 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:16 | 21:58 | 04:47 +00:29 | 21:54 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 27:14 | 05:14 +00:20 | 26:41 +00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:41 | 32:48 | 05:03 -01:22 | 31:55 +00:53 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 36:29 | 05:24 +00:09 | 36:58 -00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 42:02 | 04:45 -00:23 | 42:22 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 46:24 | 05:16 +00:23 | 47:07 -00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 52:03 | 02:08 -00:33 | 52:23 -00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 53:38 | 05:15 +00:20 | 54:31 -00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 59:13 | 04:55 +00:00 | 59:46 -00:33 |
| Running 8 | 06:46 | 01:04:08 | 05:48 +00:58 | 01:04:41 -00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 06:03 | 01:10:54 | 06:17 -00:14 | 01:10:29 +00:25 |
| Roxzone | 06:27 | 01:23:14 | 06:28 -00:01 | 01:23:14 |
Based on his splits analysis, James had a strong start with his first running lap, completing it 36 seconds faster than average. His best running lap time of 00:03:46 showcases his running ability. However, he struggled with running segments 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, as he was slower than average in these segments.
In summary, James Montgomery demonstrated a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Amsterdam, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on his running segments, optimizing transition time, and incorporating targeted training strategies, James can enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| BenoistCanteau Simon | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:02 | |
| Salucci Stefano | 2024 Gdansk | 01:23:28 | |
| Hentschke Daniel | 2023 Köln | 01:23:15 | |
| Kern Steffen | 2024 Berlin | 01:22:55 | |
| Neukirch Leo | 2024 Hamburg | 01:23:23 | |
| Wippersteg Michael | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:23:12 | |
| Gómez Sáez Marcelino | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:30 | |
| Walkingshaw Lee | 2023 Glasgow | 01:22:56 | |
| Bliss Tim | 2024 Paris | 01:23:25 | |
| Clark Steven | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:16:03 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
